Radiol Imaging Cancer 2020 Sep 25;2(5):e200016. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England (Y.C.); Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, England (J.J.J.); Department of Radiology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, England (E.J.C.); and Young Person and Adult Screening Programmes, Public Health England, Sheffield, England (J.J.).
Purpose: To compare an individual's Personal Performance in Mammographic Screening (PERFORMS) score with their Breast Screening Information System (BSIS) real-life performance data and determine which parameters in the PERFORMS scheme offer the best reflection of BSIS real-life performance metrics.
Materials And Methods: In this retrospective study, the BSIS real-life performance metrics of individual readers ( = 452) in the National Health Service Breast Screening Program (NHSBSP) in England were compared with performance in the test set-based assessment scheme over a 3-year period from 2013 to 2016. Cancer detection rate (CDR), recall rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated for each reader, for both real-life screening and the PERFORMS test. Read More