J Neuroophthalmol 2022 Jan 17. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (FFK, TTX), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Ophthalmology (JAL, VIL, MTB, JJC) and Neurology (JAL, MTB, JJC), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Circle City Neuro-Ophthalmology (KEL), Carmel, Indiana; Neuro-Ophthalmology Section (KEL), Midwest Eye Institute, Carmel, Indiana; Ophthalmology Service (KEL), Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; and Departments of Ophthalmology (KEL, MWK) and Neurology and Neurosurgery (MWK), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Background: The use of remote interpretation of data has risen in neuro-ophthalmology to increase efficiency and maintain social distancing due to the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to characterize the use and efficiency of remote interpretation of visual fields (VFs) in an academic center and to determine how often the VF interpretation was consistent with the patient's clinical history and imaging at the time of the consult.
Methods: This is a retrospective study at a single academic center that enrolled all patients receiving a remote interpretation of VF from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012. Read More