120 results match your criteria Vasovasostomy and Vasoepididymostomy

Sperm granulomas: Predictive factors and impacts on patency post vasectomy reversal.

Andrologia 2022 May 6:e14439. Epub 2022 May 6.

International Center for Vasectomy Reversal, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

The objective of this study was to identify factors that predict for sperm granuloma formation and the impact of sperm granuloma presence and quantity on vasectomy reversal (VR) outcomes. A cross sectional retrospective review of prospectively collected data, on the impact of granuloma on VR outcomes from a single academic center was performed. The impact of age, obstructive interval, intraoperative vasal fluid findings, anastomosis type, body mass index, tobacco use and total motile count (TMC) was determined. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Practice patterns of vasal reconstruction in a large United States cohort.

Andrologia 2021 12 29;53(11):e14228. Epub 2021 Aug 29.

Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

We aimed to characterise diverse practice patterns for vasal reconstruction and to determine whether surgeon volume is associated with vasoepididymostomy performance at the time of reconstruction. We identified adult men who underwent vasal reconstruction from 2000 to 2020 in Premier Healthcare Database and determined patient, surgeon, cost and hospital characteristics for each procedure. We identified 3,494 men who underwent either vasovasostomy-alone (N = 2,595, 74. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
December 2021

Vasectomy Reversal Online Marketing Practices: What Are We Putting Out There?

Urology 2021 10 9;156:129-133. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address:

Objective: To determine characteristics of providers marketing vasectomy reversal (VR) online, degree of information available online, the ease with which patients can compare providers, and the differences in VR practice patterns between academic and private practices.

Materials And Methods: We identified VR practices operating within the top 50 most populous metropolitan areas in the US. Practice websites were reviewed to obtain information such as provider educational background, level of magnification, ability to perform vasoepididymostomy, surgical volume, and cost. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
October 2021

Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: a comprehensive approach to the evolving spectrum of care.

Fertil Steril 2021 06;115(6):1363-1364

Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address:

Male reproduction and male contraception form an important spectrum within men's health. In this issue's Views and Reviews, four author groups detail important new developments in vasectomy clinical practice guidelines, emerging and investigational techniques in the fields of hormonal and nonhormonal male contraception, useful paradigms for patient care when deciding between sperm extraction with in vitro fertilization and vasectomy reversal, and finally, a state-of-the-art overview of recent developments in vasectomy reversal microsurgery. These articles will provide readers with a contemporary understanding of the rapidly evolving spectrum of male reproductive and contraceptive health care. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Impact of surgical volume and resident involvement on patency rates after vasectomy reversal-A 14-year experience in an open access system.

Asian J Urol 2021 Apr 23;8(2):197-203. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

Division of Urology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.

Objective: Evaluate the influence of fellowship training, resident participation, reconstruction type, and patient factors on outcomes after vasectomy reversals in a high volume, open access system.

Methods: Retrospective review of all vasectomy reversals performed at a single institution from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2016 was conducted. Patient and spouse demographics, patient tobacco use and comorbidities, surgeon training and case volume, resident participation, reconstruction type, and postoperative patency were collected and analyzed. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: indications, operative technique, and outcomes.

Fertil Steril 2021 06 27;115(6):1384-1392. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address:

The basic principles of vasal reconstruction have endured since their initial description over a century ago, yet the nuances and technical approaches have evolved. Prior to performing vasectomy reversal, the clinician should perform a focused history, physical and laboratory assessment, all of which are critical for patient counseling and preoperative planning. Operative success is contingent on appropriate intraoperative decision making and technical precision in completing a tension-free, watertight, and patent anastomosis. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Challenges in completing a successful vasectomy reversal.

Andrologia 2021 Jul 18;53(6):e14066. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.

Although a wide array of interventions exist for men seeking fertility after vasectomy, up to 6% of them will elect for a vasectomy reversal. While the widespread adoption of telemedicine promises convenience and improved access, lack of ability to do a physical examination may hinder appropriate counselling. Although vasectomy reversal is successfully completed in most of the men either with a vasovasostomy or a vasoepididymostomy, there could be various reasons for the inability to successfully complete the operation. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

3D digital image microscope system-assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy in rats.

Asian J Androl 2021 Jul-Aug;23(4):396-399

Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.

Optimal vision and ergonomics are essential factors contributing to the achievement of good results during microsurgery. The three-dimensional (3D) digital image microscope system with a better 3D depth of field can release strain on the surgeon's neck and back, which can improve outcomes in microsurgery. We report a randomized prospective study of vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy using a 3D digital image microscope system (3D-DIM) in rats. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
December 2021

Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute.

Nagoya J Med Sci 2020 Aug;82(3):477-485

Asada Ladies Clinic, Nagoya, Japan.

We assessed the contribution of microsurgical seminal reconstruction to achieving natural conception in conjunction with advanced assisted reproductive technologies. Ninety obstructive azoospermic subjects who underwent microsurgical seminal reconstruction were evaluated. Vasovasostomy (VV) was undertaken in 45 subjects whereas vasoepididymostomy (VE) in 45, respectively. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Robot-assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Current status and review of the literature.

Turk J Urol 2020 Sep 1;46(5):329-334. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany.

Objective: Microscope-assisted vasovasostomy (MAVV) is a standard procedure used to reverse vasectomies. Robotic surgery has been established primarily for technically demanding urological procedures and has also been recently implemented in male reproductive surgery. We aimed to review the current evidence of robot-assisted vasovasostomy (RAVV) and robot-assisted vasoepididymostomy (RAVE). Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
September 2020

The Effect of Male Age Over 50 Years on Vasectomy Reversal Outcomes.

Urology 2020 11 13;145:134-140. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address:

Objective: Advancing paternal age is associated with impaired semen parameters. We sought to evaluate reproductive outcomes in men undergoing vasectomy reversal (VR) aged ≥50 vs <50 years.

Methods: Reproductive outcomes (obstructive interval, female age, anastomosis type, post-VR total motile count (TMC), and pregnancy) after VR were assessed for men aged <50 and ≥50 years. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
November 2020

[45 years of microsurgery in urology : Contemporary witnesses report with special reference to vasectomy reversal].

Horst Oesterwitz

Urologe A 2020 Dec;59(12):1523-1540

Zentrum für Refertilisierungschirurgie, Klinik für Urologie, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Charlottenstraße 72, 14467, Potsdam, Deutschland.

On the occasion of the 45th anniversary of the introduction of microsurgery in urology, the author describes the historical development of urologic microsurgery in Germany, with special reference to vasectomy reversal. Together with contemporary witnesses, a critical historical review is drawn and the current status is analyzed as well as an outlook is given. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
December 2020

The effect of trainee involvement on surgical outcomes and complications of male infertility surgical procedures.

Andrologia 2020 Oct 19;52(9):e13719. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

In this study, we sought to determine the effect of trainee (resident or fellow physician) involvement in male infertility surgical procedures on patient surgical outcomes and complications. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was retrospectively reviewed for fertility surgical procedures from 2006 to 2012. The procedures included were as follows: epididymectomy, spermatocelectomy, varicocelectomy ± hernia repair, ejaculatory duct resection, vasovasostomy, vasoepididymostomy and 'unlisted procedure male genital system' (to capture sperm retrieval procedures). Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
October 2020

Prednisone after vasectomy reversal may improve semen parameters: one institution's experience.

Can J Urol 2020 04;27(2):10181-10184

Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Introduction: Patients with suboptimal semen parameters following vasectomy reversal represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. This may be caused by either partial or complete anastomotic obstruction. Despite the relatively common clinical use of corticosteroids in this patient population, data remain sparse. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Clinical application of cross microsurgical vasovasostomy in scrotum for atypical obstructive azoospermia.

J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2019 Mar.;20(3):282-286

Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China.

Seminal duct obstruction may result in obstructive azoospermia (OA) and severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) (<0.5 million/mL) (Nordhoff et al., 2015). Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: contemporary techniques, intraoperative decision making, and surgical training for the next generation.

Fertil Steril 2019 03;111(3):444-453

Center for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. Electronic address:

Men seeking fertility after elective sterilization can be treated with a wide array of interventions. Reconstruction of the reproductive tract remains the gold standard and most cost-effective option for the appropriately selected candidate. In the following review, the treatment algorithm for men desiring vasectomy reversal is outlined. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

[Retrospective analysis of factors affecting patency rates and causes of failure in use of single-armed two-suture microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2018 Dec;98(46):3741-3745

Department of Andrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.

To analyze the factors affecting the patency rate of microsurgical single-stitch longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy and to explore the possible causes of failure. The clinical data of 87 patients with epididymal obstructive azoospermia who underwent microsurgical vasoepididymostomy from January 2015 to February 2018 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. We observed the patency rate postoperatively and evaluated several factors that possibly related to the patency rates. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
December 2018

Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Reprod Med Biol 2018 Oct 22;17(4):343-355. Epub 2018 May 22.

Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Chiba University Chiba Japan.

Background: In the era of improving assisted reproductive technology (ART), patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA) have 2 options: vasal repair or testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Vasal repair, including vasovasostomy (VV) and vasoepididymostomy (VE), is the only option that leads to natural conception.

Methods: This article reviews the surgical techniques, outcomes, and predictors of postoperative patency and pregnancy, with a focus on articles that have reported over the last 10 years, using PubMed database searches. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
October 2018

[Microsurgical management of obstructive azoospermia: Progress and prospects].

Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2018 Jul;24(7):579-288

Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Microsurgery, Department of Urology, Cornell Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian University Hospitals for Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY 10065, USA.

In the past two decades, with the rapid development of assisted reproductive technology and particularly the technological advances in male infertility microsurgery, many obstructive azoospermia-related infertile couples can now acquire the chances of natural pregnancy via reconstruction of the seminal tract. This article highlights the latest advances in surgical reconstruction of the seminal tract for the treatment of obstructive azoospermia, such as the application of laparoscopic and robotic techniques, with a discussion on microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and preservation, potential use of absorbable sutures or the bio-suture tape for microsurgical anastomosis in the management of obstructive azoospermia. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

The Kinetics of Sperm Return and Late Failure Following Vasovasostomy or Vasoepididymostomy: A Systematic Review.

J Urol 2019 02;201(2):241-250

Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Microsurgery, Cornell Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Purpose: Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy are technically challenging microsurgical reconstructive procedures necessary for men with obstructive azoospermia at the level of the vas deferens or epididymis. Patency rates following vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy have been widely described in the literature. However, few reports have discussed the timing of sperm return to the ejaculate after reconstruction as well as the proportion of men in whom late failure develops following vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
February 2019

Reconsidering vasectomy reversal over assisted reproduction in older couples.

Fertil Steril 2018 06;109(6):1020-1024

Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Objective: To provide pregnancy and live birth rates from a contemporary series of vasectomy reversals in men with female partners aged ≥35 years and to correlate the results with IVF.

Setting: Tertiary academic referral center.

Design: Retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected database. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility.

Arab J Urol 2018 Mar 13;16(1):148-156. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

The Personalized Urology and Robotics (PUR) Clinic, South Lake Hospital, Clermont, FL, USA.

Objectives: To present the current state of the art in various robot-assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertility and review the latest literature, as the technology in infertility procedures has substantially developed since the incorporation of the Vinci® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Materials And Methods: The search strategy in this review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Factors and practice patterns that affect the decision for vasoepididymostomy.

Can J Urol 2017 Feb;24(1):8651-8655

Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Introduction: To determine the factors used to make the decision between vasovasostomy (VV) and vasoepididymostomy (VE) by leaders performing microsurgical vasectomy reversal using a questionnaire.

Materials And Methods: An online questionnaire was sent to all members of the Society for the Study of Male Reproduction (SSMR), a male reproduction subspecialty society of the AUA, using the SurveyMonkey platform.

Results: Sixty-seven surgeons responded to the questionnaire (27% of SSMR members). Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
February 2017

[Effectiveness of microsurgical crossover anastomosis in treating complicated obstructive azoospermia].

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2016 Sep;96(36):2868-2871

Department of Andrology and Pelvic Floor Surgery, Urologic Medical Center, Center for Men's Health, Institute of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of microsurgical crossover vasovasostomy in treating complicated obstructive azoospermia. The data of 14 patients with complicated obstructive azoospermia treated with microsurgical crossover vasovasostomy were reviewed from October 2012 to March 2016.Ten of them underwent microsurgical crossover vasovasostomy. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
September 2016

Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.

Asian J Androl 2016 May-Jun;18(3):365-71

Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0422, USA.

Vasectomy is a safe and effective method of contraception used by 42-60 million men worldwide. Approximately 3%-6% of men opt for a vasectomy reversal due to the death of a child or divorce and remarriage, change in financial situation, desire for more children within the same marriage, or to alleviate the dreaded postvasectomy pain syndrome. Unlike vasectomy, vasectomy reversal is a much more technically challenging procedure that is performed only by a minority of urologists and places a larger financial strain on the patient since it is usually not covered by insurance. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
January 2017

Pre-operative risk factors associated with need for vasoepididymostomy at the time of vasectomy reversal.

Andrology 2016 Jan 11;4(1):160-2. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.

The absence of sperm in the ejaculate after vasectomy reversal is commonly caused by failure to recognize and subsequently bypass epididymal or proximal vasal obstruction at the time of vasectomy reversal. If intra-operative proximal obstruction is suspected, vasoepididymostomy (VE) is recommended rather than vasovasostomy (VV). We sought to calculate the associated risk of needing VE, rather than VV with time from original vasectomy (obstructive interval) using a large cohort of vasectomy reversal patients. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
January 2016

The evolution of vasectomy reversal.

Curr Urol Rep 2015 Jun;16(6):40

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA,

In the USA, about 500,000 vasectomies are performed each year, with up to 6% of men requesting reversal. The technique of vasectomy reversal has evolved from macrosurgical to the implementation of both microscopic and robotic technologies. The very earliest attempts at vasectomy reversal, the vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy, have remained central in the treatment of male infertility and will continue to be so for years to come. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

[Microsurgical treatment of obstructive azoospermia: a report of 76 cases].

Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2015 Mar;21(3):239-44

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and/or vasovasostomy in the treatment of obstructive azoospermia.

Methods: This study included 76 patients with obstructive azoospermia, 53 treated by bilateral vasoepididymostomy (8 involving the epididymal head, 18 involving the epididymal body, 5 involving the epididymal tail, and 22 involving the epididymal head, body and tail), 14 by unilateral vasoepididymostomy, and the other 9 by unilateral vasoepididymostomy + unilateral vasovasostomy (including cross anastomosis). We followed up the patients for 2 to 16 months for the patency rate, routine semen parameters, and pregnancy outcomes. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Multiple advanced surgical techniques to treat acquired seminal duct obstruction.

Asian J Androl 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):912-6

Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518020, China.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of multiple advanced surgical treatments (i.e. microsurgery, laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic surgery) for acquired obstructive azoospermia. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF

Contemporary outcomes of seminal tract re-anastomoses for obstructive azoospermia: a nationwide Japanese survey.

Int J Urol 2015 Feb 23;22(2):213-8. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

Objectives: To evaluate current outcomes of seminal tract re-anastomoses in Japan, and to compare them with historical data.

Methods: A total of 213 patients with obstructive azoospermia who underwent seminal tract re-anastomosis from April 2008 to March 2012 at 25 institutions were enrolled in the present study. The outcomes of the procedure were compared with those reported in a previous multi-institutional study carried out in 2000. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
February 2015