Enhancing governance and strengthening advocacy for policy change of large Collective Impact initiatives.

Isabelle Michaud-Létourneau, Marion Gayard, Roger Mathisen, Linh Thi Hong Phan, Amy Weissman, David Louis Pelletier

Enhancing governance and strengthening advocacy for policy change of large Collective Impact initiatives.

Authors:
Mr Roger Mathisen, MSC, RD
Mr Roger Mathisen, MSC, RD
FHI 360 | Alive & Thrive
Clinical Nutritionist | Public Health Manager | Regional Technical Advisor
Nutrition, Infant and Young Child Feeding, severe Acute Malnutrition, Micronutrients, Maternity Protection, Public Policy
Hanoi | Vietnam

Matern Child Nutr 2019 02;15 Suppl 2:e12728

Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Nutrition issues are increasingly being addressed through global partnerships and multi-sectoral initiatives. Ensuring effective governance of these initiatives is instrumental for achieving large-scale impact. The Collective Impact (CI) approach is an insightful framework that can be used to guide and assess the effectiveness of this governance. Despite the utility and widespread use of this approach, two gaps are identified: a limited understanding of the implications of expansion for an initiative operating under the conditions of CI and a lack of attention to advocacy for policy change in CI initiatives. In this paper, a case study was undertaken in which the CI lens was applied to the advocacy efforts of Alive & Thrive (A&T), UNICEF and partners. The initiative expanded into a regional movement and achieved meaningful policy changes in infant and young child feeding policies in seven countries in Southeast Asia. These efforts are examined in order to address the two gaps identified in the CI approach. The objectives of the paper are (a) to examine the governance of this initiative and the process of expansion from a national to a regional, multilayered initiative, with attention to challenges, adaptations, and key elements, and (b) to compare advocacy in the A&T-UNICEF initiative and in typical CI initiatives and gain insight into how the practice of advocacy for policy change can be strengthened in CI initiatives.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12728DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519038PMC
February 2019
141 Reads
2.973 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

advocacy policy
12
policy change
12
gaps identified
8
collective impact
8
initiatives
6
advocacy
5
initiative
5
movement achieved
4
expanded regional
4
regional movement
4
initiative expanded
4
a&t unicef
4
unicef partners
4
partners initiative
4
changes infant
4
child feeding
4
feeding policies
4
policies countries
4
young child
4
infant young
4

Altmetric Statistics

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

Alderman et al.
2013
Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organizations: A critical review
Almog-Bar et al.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2014
Creating a collective impact on childhood obesity: Lessons from the SCOPE initiative
Amed et al.
Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique 2015

Cabaj et al.
2016