The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Ann Intern Med 2001 Apr;134(8):657-62

Thomas C. Chalmers Center for Systematic Reviews, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Room R2226, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada.

To comprehend the results of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation. That goal can be achieved only through complete transparency from authors. Despite several decades of educational efforts, the reporting of RCTs needs improvement. Investigators and editors developed the original CONSORT (Con solidated S tandards o f R eporting T rials) statement to help authors improve reporting by using a checklist and flow diagram. The revised CONSORT statement presented in this paper incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement. The checklist items pertain to the content of the Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The revised checklist includes 22 items selected because empirical evidence indicates that not reporting the information is associated with biased estimates of treatment effect or because the information is essential to judge the reliability or relevance of the findings. We intended the flow diagram to depict the passage of participants through an RCT. The revised flow diagram depicts information from four stages of a trial (enrollment, intervention allocation, follow-up, and analysis). The diagram explicitly includes the number of participants, for each intervention group, that are included in the primary data analysis. Inclusion of these numbers allows the reader to judge whether the authors have performed an intention-to-treat analysis. In sum, the CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011DOI Listing
April 2001
4 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flow diagram
12
consort statement
12
readers understand
8
improve reporting
8
selected empirical
4
empirical evidence
4
indicates reporting
4
evidence indicates
4
includes items
4
revised checklist
4
checklist includes
4
reporting associated
4
items selected
4
estimates treatment
4
reliability relevance
4
relevance findings
4
findings intended
4
intended flow
4
judge reliability
4
essential judge
4

Similar Publications