Recurrent, robust and scalable patterns underlie human approach and avoidance.

PLoS One 2010 May 26;5(5):e10613. Epub 2010 May 26.

Motivation and Emotion Neuroscience Collaboration, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Background: Approach and avoidance behavior provide a means for assessing the rewarding or aversive value of stimuli, and can be quantified by a keypress procedure whereby subjects work to increase (approach), decrease (avoid), or do nothing about time of exposure to a rewarding/aversive stimulus. To investigate whether approach/avoidance behavior might be governed by quantitative principles that meet engineering criteria for lawfulness and that encode known features of reward/aversion function, we evaluated whether keypress responses toward pictures with potential motivational value produced any regular patterns, such as a trade-off between approach and avoidance, or recurrent lawful patterns as observed with prospect theory.

Methodology/principal Findings: Three sets of experiments employed this task with beautiful face images, a standardized set of affective photographs, and pictures of food during controlled states of hunger and satiety. An iterative modeling approach to data identified multiple law-like patterns, based on variables grounded in the individual. These patterns were consistent across stimulus types, robust to noise, describable by a simple power law, and scalable between individuals and groups. Patterns included: (i) a preference trade-off counterbalancing approach and avoidance, (ii) a value function linking preference intensity to uncertainty about preference, and (iii) a saturation function linking preference intensity to its standard deviation, thereby setting limits to both.

Conclusions/significance: These law-like patterns were compatible with critical features of prospect theory, the matching law, and alliesthesia. Furthermore, they appeared consistent with both mean-variance and expected utility approaches to the assessment of risk. Ordering of responses across categories of stimuli demonstrated three properties thought to be relevant for preference-based choice, suggesting these patterns might be grouped together as a relative preference theory. Since variables in these patterns have been associated with reward circuitry structure and function, they may provide a method for quantitative phenotyping of normative and pathological function (e.g., psychiatric illness).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0010613PLOS
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879576PMC
May 2010
6 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

approach avoidance
16
patterns
9
linking preference
8
function linking
8
preference intensity
8
law-like patterns
8
approach
6
preference
5
function
5
power law
4
scalable individuals
4
law scalable
4
describable simple
4
types robust
4
stimulus types
4
robust noise
4
noise describable
4
individuals groups
4
simple power
4
included preference
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
A Dynamic Theory of Personality: Selected Papers of Kurt Lewin
K Lewin et al.
1935
An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal.
TC Schneirla et al.
1959
On the neural computation of utility: implications from studies of brain stimulation reward.
P Shizgal et al.
1999
Neurobiological substrates of dread.
GS Berns et al.
Science 2006
Neuroeconomics.
G Loewenstein et al.
Annu Rev Psychol 2008
The neurobiology of trust.
PJ Zak et al.
Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004

Similar Publications