Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution.

BMC Health Serv Res 2003 Dec 31;3(1):25. Epub 2003 Dec 31.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Background: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined by symptoms and disability, has no confirmatory physical signs or characteristic laboratory abnormalities, and the etiology and pathophysiology remain unknown. Difficulties with accurate case ascertainment contribute to this ignorance.

Methods: Experienced investigators from around the world who are involved in CFS research met for a series of three day workshops in 2000, 2001 and 2002 intended to identify the problems in application of the current CFS case definition. The investigators were divided into focus groups and each group was charged with a topic. The investigators in each focus group relied on their own clinical and scientific knowledge, brainstorming within each group and with all investigators when focus group summaries were presented. Relevant literature was selected and reviewed independent of the workshops. The relevant literature was circulated via list-serves and resolved as being relevant by group consensus. Focus group reports were analyzed and compiled into the recommendations presented here.

Results: Ambiguities in the current CFS research definition that contribute to inconsistent case identification were identified. Recommendations for use of the definition, standardization of classification instruments and study design issues are presented that are intended to improve the precision of case ascertainment. The International CFS Study Group also identified ambiguities associated with exclusionary and comorbid conditions and reviewed the standardized, internationally applicable instruments used to measure symptoms, fatigue intensity and associated disability.

Conclusion: This paper provides an approach to guide systematic, and hopefully reproducible, application of the current case definition, so that case ascertainment would be more uniform across sites. Ultimately, an operational CFS case definition will need to be based on empirical studies designed to delineate the possibly distinct biological pathways that result in chronic fatigue.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-3-25DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC317472PMC
December 2003
13 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

case definition
16
case ascertainment
12
chronic fatigue
12
focus group
12
current cfs
8
case
8
cfs case
8
relevant literature
8
application current
8
fatigue syndrome
8
investigators focus
8
group
7
cfs
6
definition
6
contribute inconsistent
4
definition contribute
4
presented hereresults
4
compiled recommendations
4
analyzed compiled
4
recommendations presented
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

S Wessely et al.
1994

GP Holmes et al.
Ann Intern Med 1988

AR Lloyd et al.
Med J Aust 1990

MC Sharpe et al.
J R Soc Med 1991

K Fukuda et al.
Ann Int Med 1994

A Wilson et al.
Aust N Z J Psych 2001

RR Taylor et al.
2001

G Andrews et al.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998

RR Taylor et al.
Psychology and Health: The International Review of Health Psychology 1998

U Bultmann et al.
J Occup Health Psychol 2000

JB Prins et al.
Lancet 2001

Similar Publications