Recipient ctla-4 +49 G/G genotype is associated with reduced incidence of acute rejection after liver transplantation.

Am J Transplant 2003 Dec;3(12):1587-94

Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether acute rejection after liver transplantation is associated with known single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CD86- and CTLA-4 genes of liver-transplant donors and recipients. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were determined in 135 liver transplant recipients and in 73 donors. Acute rejection was not associated with CD86 + 1057 G/A genotype distributions in donors and in recipients. In univariate analysis recipient CTLA-4 -318 G/T and + 49 A/G genotype distributions were both weakly associated with acute rejection. Multivariate analysis revealed that the CTLA-4 + 49 SNP, but not the -318 SNP, was independently of other risk factors associated with acute rejection. Only one out of 13 CTLA-4 + 49 G-homozygotes (8%) experienced acute rejection(s) compared with 40% of A/A or A/G recipients. The CTLA-4 + 49 A/G SNP, which results in an amino acid substitution in the signal peptide of the protein, did not, however, affect intracellular expression or trafficking of CTLA-4 in T cells, nor soluble serum CTLA-4 concentrations of the liver transplant recipients. In conclusion, this pilot study suggests that liver transplant recipients homozygous for CTLA-4 + 49 G have a reduced risk of acute rejection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00261.xDOI Listing
December 2003
6 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acute rejection
24
liver transplant
12
transplant recipients
12
associated acute
8
genotype distributions
8
donors recipients
8
rejection liver
8
liver transplantation
8
recipient ctla-4
8
pilot study
8
ctla-4
8
acute
7
recipients
6
rejection
6
associated
5
liver
5
recipients ctla-4
4
distributions donors
4
a/g snp
4
analysis recipient
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

Bluestone JA et al.
J Immunol 1997

Sho M et al.
J Immunol 2002

Sanchez-Fueyo A et al.
J Immunol 2002

Kingsley CI et al.
J Immunol 2002

Kouki T et al.
J Immunol 2000

Similar Publications