Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace.

Anaesthesia 2000 Nov;55(11):1122-6

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.

Anaesthetists' ability to identify correctly a marked lumbar interspace was assessed in 100 patients undergoing spinal magnetic resonance imaging scans. Using ink, one anaesthetist marked an interspace on the lower spine and attempted to identify its level with the patient in the sitting position. A second anaesthetist attempted to identify the level with the patient in the flexed lateral position. A marker capsule was taped over the ink mark and a routine scan performed. The actual level of markers ranged from one space below to four spaces above the level at which the anaesthetist believed it to be. The marker was one space higher than assumed in 51% of cases and was identified correctly in only 29%. Accuracy was unaffected by patient position (sitting or lateral), although it was impaired by obesity (p = 0.001) and positioning of the markers high on the lower back (p < 0.001). The spinal cord terminated below L(1) in 19% of patients. This, together with the risk of accidentally selecting a higher interspace than intended for intrathecal injection, implies that spinal cord trauma is more likely when higher interspaces are selected.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-4.xDOI Listing
November 2000
5 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lumbar interspace
8
attempted identify
8
level patient
8
spinal cord
8
identify level
8
marked lumbar
8
level anaesthetist
4
marker space
4
anaesthetist believed
4
believed marker
4
higher assumed
4
correctly 29%
4
29% accuracy
4
identified correctly
4
cases identified
4
assumed 51%
4
51% cases
4
space higher
4
space spaces
4
ink mark
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

Van Gessel EF et al.
Anesthesia and Analgesia 1993

Moore DC et al.
Anesthesia and Analgesia 1970

Ievins FA et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991

Rajakulendran Y et al.
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1999

Render CA et al.
Anaesthesia 1996

Thavasothy M et al.
Anaesthesia 1997

Gordh T et al.
1979

Thomson A et al.
Journal of Anatomy and Physiology 1895

McCotter RE et al.
Anatomical Record 1916

Needles JH et al.
Anatomical Record 1935

Similar Publications