Colorectal follow-up planning modified on the basis of our personal experience.

Dig Surg 1998 ;15(1):64-8

Fist Surgical Clinic, University of Catania, Italy.

Background: The authors, evaluating the disappointing follow-up results in patients suffering from colorectal carcinoma who had undergone surgery for cure, tried a more rational follow-up.

Methods: In a retrospective review about 232 patients who adhered to the follow-up protocol, we evaluated the accuracy rates of CEA, liver ultrasonography and abdominal CT. In the same group of patients. we evaluated the type of correlation between the neoplastic recurrence rate and Astler-Coller's classification.

Results: (1) In detecting hepatic metastases CEA levels furnished sensitivity and negative predictive value more than liver ultrasonography (83.3 vs. 77.8% and 98.4 vs. 98%, respectively); (2) in our series, we obtained a lower recurrence rate in classes A+B1 (7.5%) and B2 (20.8%) and higher in C1+C2 (44.4%) and D (66.7%) (p < 0.0 1).

Conclusion: According to these data we decided to eliminate postoperative liver ultrasonography and customize follow-up protocol on tumor staging and timing of cancer relapse. The authors believe that these changes will not modify the results, but cause less psychophysical stress for the patients and reduce costs by 50%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000018589DOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
December 1998
53 Reads
1 Citation
1.742 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver ultrasonography
12
recurrence rate
8
follow-up protocol
8
higher c1+c2
4
cea liver
4
data decided
4
staging timing
4
patients evaluated
4
group patients
4
abdominal group
4
833 778%
4
ultrasonography abdominal
4
rates cea
4
protocol evaluated
4
984 98%
4
98% series
4
adhered follow-up
4
1conclusion data
4
evaluated accuracy
4
778% 984
4

Similar Publications