Pubfacts - Scientific Publication Data
  • Categories
  • |
  • Journals
  • |
  • Authors
  • Login
  • Categories
  • Journals

Search Our Scientific Publications & Authors

Publications
  • Publications
  • Authors
find publications by category +
Translate page:

Intraoperative aberrometry compared to preoperative Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power selection in eyes with prior refractive surgery.

Authors:
Suzie A Gasparian Saman Nassiri Hyelin You Abby Vercio Frank S Hwang

Sci Rep 2022 05 5;12(1):7357. Epub 2022 May 5.

Loma Linda University Eye Institute, 11370 Anderson Street, Suite 1800, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA.

To compare the predictive refractive accuracy of intraoperative aberrometry (ORA) to the preoperative Barrett True-K formula in the calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes with prior refractive surgery undergoing cataract surgery at the Loma Linda University Eye Institute, Loma Linda, California, USA. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with a history of post-myopic or hyperopic LASIK/PRK who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery between October 2016 and March 2020. Pre-operative measurements were performed utilizing the Barrett True-K formula. Intraoperative aberrometry (ORA) was used for aphakic refraction and IOL power calculation during surgery. Predictive refractive accuracy of the two methods was compared based on the difference between achieved and intended target spherical equivalent. A total of 97 eyes (69 patients) were included in the study. Of these, 81 eyes (83.5%) had previous myopic LASIK/PRK and 16 eyes (16.5%) had previous hyperopic LASIK/PRK. Median (MedAE)/mean (MAE) absolute prediction errors for preoperative as compared to intraoperative methods were 0.49 D/0.58 D compared to 0.42 D/0.51 D, respectively (P = 0.001/0.002). Over all, ORA led to a statistically significant lower median and mean absolute error compared to the Barrett True-K formula in post-refractive eyes. Percentage of eyes within ± 1.00 D of intended target refraction as predicted by the preoperative versus the intraoperative method was 82.3% and 89.6%, respectively (P = 0.04). Although ORA led to a statistically significant lower median absolute error compared to the Barrett True-K formula, the two methods are clinically comparable in predictive refractive accuracy in patients with prior refractive surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11462-8DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9072433PMC
May 2022

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

barrett true-k
20
true-k formula
20
refractive accuracy
12
intraoperative aberrometry
12
refractive surgery
12
predictive refractive
12
prior refractive
12
eyes prior
8
hyperopic lasik/prk
8
absolute error
8
ora led
8
led statistically
8
intraocular lens
8
error compared
8
statistically lower
8
iol power
8
intended target
8
preoperative barrett
8
lower median
8
aberrometry ora
8

Keyword Occurance

Similar Publications

Accuracy of Formulas for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation After Myopic Refractive Surgery.

Authors:
Michele Lanza Adriano Ruggiero Jason Ha Francesca Simonelli Jack X Kane

J Refract Surg 2022 Jul 1;38(7):443-449. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of the following intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas: Barrett True-K No History (BTKNH), Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0 Post Myopic LASIK/PRK (EVO 2.0), Haigis-L, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) average, and Shammas, designed for patients who have undergone previous myopic refractive surgery, independent of preexisting clinical history and corneal tomographic measurements. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
July 2022
Similar Publications

The influence of corneal ablation patterns on prediction error after cataract surgery in post-myopic-LASIK eyes.

Authors:
Yunqian Yao Jing Zhao Jifeng Yu Wenwen He Ling Wei Xingtao Zhou Yi Lu Xiangjia Zhu

Eye Vis (Lond) 2022 Jul 1;9(1):23. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China.

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of corneal ablation patterns on the prediction error after cataract surgery in post-myopic-LASIK eyes.

Methods: Eighty-three post-myopic-LASIK eyes of 83 patients that underwent uneventful cataract surgery were retrospectively included. Predicted postoperative spherical equivalence (SE) was calculated for the implanted lens using the Haigis-L and Barrett True-K formula. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
July 2022
Similar Publications

Ray tracing biometry in post radial keratotomy eye.

Authors:
Dubbaka Srujana Sandeep Shankar Rohit Bhanot Renu Mohandas S Srikanth Ashok Kumar

Eur J Ophthalmol 2022 May 15:11206721221102268. Epub 2022 May 15.

Department of Ophthalmology, 29590AFMC, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Objective: To report a case of post radial keratotomy (RK) cataract in a 55-year-old lady wherein biometry was done by ray-tracing method incorporated in scheimpflug topographer (Sirius + Scheimpflug Analyzer, CSO, Italy).

Method: In our case, we performed intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using a recent concept of ray tracing with scheimpflug topographer and compared with traditional methods available at American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery(ASCRS) website (www.ascrs. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
May 2022
Similar Publications

Intraocular lens power calculation after two different successive corneal refractive surgeries.

Authors:
Zongsheng Zeng Xiangyu Ye Qingzhong Chen Changkai Jia Guangbin Zhang

Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2022 Jun 26;26:101547. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

Xiamen Eye Centre, Affiliated with Xiamen University, 336 XiaHe Road, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

Purpose: To report two challenging intraocular lens power calculation cases with patients each underwent different successive corneal refractive surgeries, respectively.

Observations: Biometry data, including the Back to Front corneal radii ratio (B/F ratio), were collected by Lenstar, IOL Master, and Pentacam AXL for Case 1 (received radial keratotomy (RK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)) and Case 2 (received RK and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)). The IOL power calculation was determined by several methods, including Shammas, Haigis-L, and Barrett True-K, which are available in the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator and Pentacam AXL. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
June 2022
Similar Publications

Intraoperative aberrometry compared to preoperative Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power selection in eyes with prior refractive surgery.

Authors:
Suzie A Gasparian Saman Nassiri Hyelin You Abby Vercio Frank S Hwang

Sci Rep 2022 05 5;12(1):7357. Epub 2022 May 5.

Loma Linda University Eye Institute, 11370 Anderson Street, Suite 1800, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA.

To compare the predictive refractive accuracy of intraoperative aberrometry (ORA) to the preoperative Barrett True-K formula in the calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes with prior refractive surgery undergoing cataract surgery at the Loma Linda University Eye Institute, Loma Linda, California, USA. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with a history of post-myopic or hyperopic LASIK/PRK who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery between October 2016 and March 2020. Pre-operative measurements were performed utilizing the Barrett True-K formula. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
May 2022
Similar Publications
}
© 2022 PubFacts.
  • About PubFacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap