Pubfacts - Scientific Publication Data
  • Categories
  • |
  • Journals
  • |
  • Authors
  • Login
  • Categories
  • Journals

Search Our Scientific Publications & Authors

Publications
  • Publications
  • Authors
find publications by category +
Translate page:

Comparative efficacy of different varieties of toothbrushes in plaque control: A 12-week clinical trial.

Authors:
Ajit K Prusty Shivani Sharma Sumit Malhotra

Indian J Dent Res 2021 Jul-Sep;32(3):372-379

Department of Periodontics, ITS Dental College, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Aim: The aim of this 12 week, single-blind clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of Manual (Oral-B Pro Health Gum care), Powered (Oral-B Cross action Power Dual) and Charcoal (Colgate slim Soft Charcoal) toothbrushes in plaque control.

Materials And Methods: 60 systemically healthy students were selected at random among the students of a Dental College, living under similar environment and dietary conditions. Plaque and calculus were removed professionally and three varieties of toothbrush were distributed among them. Plaque index (PI), sulcus bleeding index (SBI) and gingival index (GI) were assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 weeks. Assessment of colony forming units (CFU) was done at baseline and 12 week. The learning effect over a period of time was also assessed.

Results: Over the 12-week period, PI reduced significantly (P < 0.001) with % reduction in plaque from 47% to 59%, 41% to 53% and 45% to 55% for manual, powered and charcoal brush. A significant reduction in GI and SBI was also seen with all the brushes. An insignificant difference in PI, GI and SBI was seen between the brushes. CFU count before and after brushing reduced gradually and statistically significantly (P < 0.001) for all the brushes; however, by end of 12 week period, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). The learning effect increased from 35% to 60%, 24% to 56% and 31% to 58% for three brushes, respectively, but was more pronounced for powered brush.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that all the three brushes (manual, powered and charcoal) are clinically effective in removing plaque, with learning effect more pronounced for powered brush and if proper technique is followed, no brush is superior to the other.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_179_20DOI Listing
March 2022

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sbi brushes
8
powered charcoal
8
manual powered
8
toothbrushes plaque
8
three brushes
8
pronounced powered
8
clinical trial
8
plaque
6
brushes
5
powered
5
reduction plaque
4
assessedresults 12-week
4
12-week period
4
period reduced
4
reduced 0001
4
0001 reduction
4
59% 41%
4
plaque 47%
4
47% 59%
4
period time
4

Keyword Occurance

Similar Publications

Comparative efficacy of different varieties of toothbrushes in plaque control: A 12-week clinical trial.

Authors:
Ajit K Prusty Shivani Sharma Sumit Malhotra

Indian J Dent Res 2021 Jul-Sep;32(3):372-379

Department of Periodontics, ITS Dental College, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Aim: The aim of this 12 week, single-blind clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of Manual (Oral-B Pro Health Gum care), Powered (Oral-B Cross action Power Dual) and Charcoal (Colgate slim Soft Charcoal) toothbrushes in plaque control.

Materials And Methods: 60 systemically healthy students were selected at random among the students of a Dental College, living under similar environment and dietary conditions. Plaque and calculus were removed professionally and three varieties of toothbrush were distributed among them. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
March 2022
Similar Publications

Comparison of different tooth brushes on the degree of plaque removal.

Authors:
Santosh Kumar Verma Nitesh Sharma Swati Singh Md Ahsan Razi

J Family Med Prim Care 2020 Feb 28;9(2):556-560. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

Department of Periodontics, Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Hazaribag, Bihar, India.

Background: At present, different designs of tooth brushes are available, each one is being claimed to be the best by their manufacturers. There is a need to compare the plaque removal efficacy of the most popular designs.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the degree ofplaque removal obtained with the use of two commercially available tooth brushes with round ended and thinner tip bristles. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
February 2020
Similar Publications

Comparison Between Two Interproximal Cleaning Procedures in Periodontitis Patients: A Six-month, Single-blind, Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:
Bastian Schmidt Holger Jentsch

Oral Health Prev Dent 2015 ;13(3):205-11

Purpose: To determine whether mechanical cleaning with interdental brushes combined with the use of cetylpyridinium chloride (0.3% CPC) gel was more effective at plaque control than mechanical cleaning with interdental brushes alone.

Materials And Methods: Forty individuals (30-70 years old) with at least 20 teeth and moderate chronic periodontitis who had no experience with interdental cleaning aids were randomly assigned to a treatment group (brush + gel, n = 20) or a control group (brush, n = 20). Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
August 2015
Similar Publications
}
© 2022 PubFacts.
  • About PubFacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap