Pubfacts - Scientific Publication Data
  • Categories
  • |
  • Journals
  • |
  • Authors
  • Login
  • Categories
  • Journals

Search Our Scientific Publications & Authors

Publications
  • Publications
  • Authors
find publications by category +
Translate page:

Follow the money: a closer look at US tobacco industry marketing expenditures.

Authors:
David T Levy Alex C Liber Christopher Cadham Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero Andrew Hyland Michael Cummings Cliff Douglas Rafael Meza Lisa Henriksen

Tob Control 2022 Jan 24. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Introduction: While much of the concern with tobacco industry marketing has focused on direct media advertising, a less explored form of marketing strategy is to discount prices. Price discounting is important because it keeps the purchase price low and can undermine the impact of tax increases.

Methods: We examine annual US marketing expenditures from 1975 to 2019 by the largest cigarette and smokeless tobacco companies as reported to the Federal Trade Commission. We consider three categories: direct advertising, promotional allowances and price discounting. In addition to considering trends in these expenditures, we examine how price discounting expenditures relate to changes in product prices and excise taxes.

Results: US direct advertising expenditures for cigarettes fell from 80% of total industry marketing expenditures in 1975 to less than 3% in 2019, while falling from 39% in 1985 to 6% in 2019 for smokeless tobacco. Price discounting expenditures for cigarettes became prominent after the Master Settlement Agreement and related tax increases in 2002. By 2019, 87% of cigarette marketing expenditures were for price discounts and 7% for promotional allowances. Smokeless marketing expenditures were similar: 72% for price promotions and 13% for promotional allowances. Price discounting increased with prices and taxes until reaching their currently high levels.

Conclusions: Between 1975 and 2019, direct advertising dramatically fell while price discounting and promotional expenditures increased. Local, state and federal policies are needed that apply non-tax mechanisms to increase tobacco prices and restrict industry contracts to offset industry marketing strategies. Further study is needed to better understand industry decisions about marketing expenditures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056971DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9346571PMC
January 2022

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

price discounting
24
marketing expenditures
24
industry marketing
16
promotional allowances
12
1975 2019
12
direct advertising
12
expenditures
11
price
9
marketing
9
smokeless tobacco
8
expenditures cigarettes
8
allowances price
8
discounting expenditures
8
expenditures 1975
8
tobacco industry
8
industry
6
discounting
6
0
5
tobacco
5
agreement tax
4

Keyword Occurance

Similar Publications

Estimating the lagged effect of price discounting: a time-series study on sugar sweetened beverage purchasing in a supermarket.

Authors:
Hiroshi Mamiya Alexandra M Schmidt Erica E M Moodie David L Buckeridge

BMC Public Health 2022 08 6;22(1):1502. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

School of Global and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Suite 1200, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A1G1, Canada.

Background: Price discount is an unregulated obesogenic environmental risk factor for the purchasing of unhealthy food, including Sugar Sweetened Beverages (SSB). Sales of price discounted food items are known to increase during the period of discounting. However, the presence and extent of the lagged effect of discounting, a sustained level of sales after discounting ends, is previously unaccounted for. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
August 2022
Similar Publications

Age differences in the behavioural economics of cannabis use: Do adolescents and adults differ on demand for cannabis and discounting of future reward?

Authors:
A Borissova S Soni E R Aston R Lees K Petrilli M B Wall M A P Bloomfield E Mertzani A Paksina T P Freeman C Mokrysz W Lawn H V Curran

Drug Alcohol Depend 2022 Jun 9;238:109531. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Background: Adolescence is a period of psychological and neural development in which harms associated with cannabis use may be heightened. We hypothesised that adolescent who use cannabis (adolescentsWUC) would have steeper delay discounting (preference for immediate over future rewards) and greater demand (relative valuation) for cannabis than adults who use cannabis (adultsWUC).

Methods: This cross-sectional study, part of the 'CannTeen' project, compared adultsWUC (n = 71, 26-29 years old) and adolescentsWUC (n = 76, 16-17 years old), and gender- and age-matched adolescent (n = 63) and adult (n = 64) controls. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
June 2022
Similar Publications

A general model of demand and discounting.

Authors:
Steven R Hursh Lindsay P Schwartz

Psychol Addict Behav 2022 Jun 30. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

Institutes for Behavior Resources.

Objective: A simulation using a two-commodity demand model, with time as the constraint, replicated the primary findings from delay discounting experiments and introduces explicit terms for time elasticity and cross-price substitution into the delay discounting paradigm.

Method: A two-commodity temporal demand equation based on Hursh and Silberberg (2008) and Hursh (2014) was used to emulate delay discounting experiments. The own-price and cross-price demand curves intersected and plotting those indifference points emulated the usual hyperbolic discount function for substitutes. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
June 2022
Similar Publications

Everything comes at a price: Considerations in modeling effort-based choice.

Authors:
Wojciech Białaszek Przemysław Marcowski Szymon Mizak

Behav Processes 2022 Aug 24;200:104692. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, DecisionLab: Center for Behavioral Research in Decision Making, Institute of Psychology, Warsaw, Poland.

When observing human behavior, one of the key factors determining choice is effort. It is often assumed that people prefer an easier course of action when the alternative yields the same benefits. However, recent research demonstrates that this is not always the case: effort is not always costly and can also add value. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
August 2022
Similar Publications

Limitations of standard cost-effectiveness methods for health technology assessment of treatments for rare, chronic diseases: a case study of treatment for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:
Jaime L Rubin Andrea Lopez Jason Booth Penilla Gunther Anupam B Jena

J Med Econ 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):783-791

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Objectives: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is useful to assess the value of health care interventions based on clinical effectiveness and costs. However, standard CEA methods make important assumptions that may significantly increase the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for lifelong treatments for rare, chronic diseases. We used the cost-effectiveness of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor and ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) for the treatment of cystic fibrosis as a case study to explore how alternative assumptions for (1) discounting, (2) utility measures, (3) disease management costs, and (4) static drug pricing impact cost-effectiveness outcomes. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
June 2022
Similar Publications
}
© 2022 PubFacts.
  • About PubFacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap