Pubfacts - Scientific Publication Data
  • Categories
  • |
  • Journals
  • |
  • Authors
  • Login
  • Categories
  • Journals

Search Our Scientific Publications & Authors

Publications
  • Publications
  • Authors
find publications by category +
Translate page:

Validation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Error Grid Analysis.

Authors:
Takashi Juri Koichi Suehiro Rieko Kanematsu Kanae Takahashi Yohei Fujimoto Katsuaki Tanaka Takashi Mori

Anesth Analg 2022 04;134(4):773-780

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Background: Error grid analysis was recently proposed to compare blood pressure obtained by 2 measurement methods. This study aimed to compare continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) with invasive blood pressure (IBP) using the error grid analysis and investigate the confounding risk factors attributable to the differences between CNBP and IBP.

Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing general anesthesia were prospectively enrolled. Simultaneous comparative data regarding CNBP and IBP were collected. The Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to compare CNBP and IBP for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean blood pressure (MBP; acceptable accuracy: mean bias <5 mm Hg; standard deviation <8 mm Hg). The clinical relevance of the discrepancies between CNBP and IBP was evaluated by the error grid analysis, which classifies the differences into 5 zones from "no risk" (A) to "dangerous risk" (E). Additionally, an ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the risk zones for MBP, classified by the error grid analysis and covariates of interest.

Results: A total of 10,663 pairs of CNBP/IBP were finally analyzed. The Bland-Altman analysis showed an acceptable accuracy with a bias of -3.3 ± 5.6 mm Hg for MBP but a poor accuracy with a bias of 5.4 ± 10.5 mm Hg for SBP. The error grid analysis showed the proportions of zones A to E as 96.7%, 3.2%, 0.1%, 0%, and 0% for SBP, respectively, and 72.0%, 27.9%, 0.1%, 0%, and 0% for MBP, respectively. The finger cuff missed 23.9% of epochs when SBP <90 mm Hg and 55.3% of epochs when MBP <65 mm Hg. The ordinal logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (adjusted odds ratio for decade: 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.08; P = .004) and length of time from the initiation of finger cuff inflation (adjusted odds ratio for 60 minutes: 1.40, 95% CI, 1.13-1.73; P = .002) were significant factors of being in a more dangerous zone of the error grid.

Conclusions: The error grid analysis revealed the larger clinical discrepancy between CNBP and IBP in MBP compared with that in SBP. Old age and longer finger cuff inflation time were significant factors of being in a more dangerous zone of the error grid, which could affect the hemodynamic management during surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005882DOI Listing
April 2022

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood pressure
24
grid analysis
12
error grid
12
cnbp ibp
8
continuous noninvasive
8
noninvasive blood
8
blood
6
pressure
6
accuracy bias
4
anesthesia prospectively
4
general anesthesia
4
undergoing general
4
patients undergoing
4
adult patients
4
sixty adult
4
cnbp ibpmethods
4
ibpmethods sixty
4
enrolled simultaneous
4
differences cnbp
4
attributable differences
4

Keyword Occurance

Similar Publications

Aortic Diastolic Blood Pressure and Widened Pulse Pressure as Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Measurements.

Authors:
Daniel H Steinberg

Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2022 Jun 2;39:26-27. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America. Electronic address:

View Article and Full-Text PDF
June 2022
Similar Publications
}
© 2022 PubFacts.
  • About PubFacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap