Pubfacts - Scientific Publication Data
  • Categories
  • |
  • Journals
  • |
  • Authors
  • Login
  • Categories
  • Journals

Search Our Scientific Publications & Authors

Publications
  • Publications
  • Authors
find publications by category +
Translate page:

Do the benefits of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters outweigh the risks in trauma patients? A meta-analysis.

Authors:
Mahir Gachabayov Lulejeta A Latifi Rifat Latifi

Acta Chir Belg 2022 Jun 27;122(3):151-159. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.

Introduction: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate whether the benefits of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) outweigh the risks thereof.

Patients And Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for records published from 1980 to 2018 by two independent researchers (MG, GG). The endpoints of interest were pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rates. Quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Mantel-Haenszel method with odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (OR (95%CI)) as the measure of effect size was utilized for meta-analysis.

Results: Fifteen studies (two randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies) were included in the meta-analysis. PE rate was 0.9% (11/1183) in IVCF vs. 0.6% (240/39,417) in No IVCF. This difference was not statistically significant [OR (95%CI) = 0.31 (0.06, 1.51);  = 0.15]. DVT rate was 8.4% (77/915) in IVCF vs. 1.7% (653/38,807) in No IVCF. The difference was not statistically significant [OR (95%CI) = 2.67 (0.90, 7.98);  = 0.08]. In the subset of RCTs, PE rate was 0% (0/64) in IVCF vs. 12% (6/5) in No IVCF. This difference was statistically significant [OR (95%CI) = 0.12 (0.01, 1.03);  = 0.05].

Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that prophylactic IVCF may be associated with decreased PE rates at the possible cost of increased DVT rates. Further observational and experimental clinical studies are needed to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2022.2031534DOI Listing
June 2022

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

difference statistically
12
statistically [or
12
[or 95%ci
12
ivcf difference
12
benefits prophylactic
8
outweigh risks
8
dvt rates
8
cava filters
8
ivcf
8
vena cava
8
inferior vena
8
prophylactic inferior
8
meta-analysis
5
031 006
4
151  = 015]
4
systematic reviews
4
handbook systematic
4
95%ci 031
4
cochrane handbook
4
006 151
4

Keyword Occurance

Similar Publications

Voiding Time for the Evaluation of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men - A Potential Option for Addressing Disparity Related Access to Urodynamic Testing.

Authors:
Gaurav Pahouja Parth Patel Enrique Blanco Martinez Elizabeth Mueller Kevin T McVary

Urology 2022 Aug 12. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL. Electronic address:

Objectives: To investigate voiding time (VT) in asymptomatic and symptomatic men, and compare VT to other parameters such as maximum flow rates (Qmax) as a possible solution to disparity related lack of access to standard urodynamic testing.

Methods: We conducted a controlled prospective study on a total of 30 patients. Exclusion criteria included ongoing medical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or a history of invasive therapy for LUTS. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
August 2022
Similar Publications

Placement of an intrauterine device within 48 hours after early medical abortion - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:
Sara Hogmark Karin Lichtenstein Liljeblad Niklas Envall Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson Helena Kopp Kallner

Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022 Aug 12. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Background: Intrauterine devices are safe, well tolerated and known to reduce the risk of unwanted pregnancies. At medical abortion, intrauterine devices are placed at a follow-up visit. Patients who miss this visit risk being left without contraception. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
August 2022
Similar Publications

(Even Off-Label) Cochlear Implantation in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss Results in Measurable Objective and Subjective Benefit.

Authors:
Sarah A Sydlowski Nathan Farrokhian Marisa Carrozza Carmen Jamis Erika Woodson

Otol Neurotol 2022 Sep;43(8):e895-e902

Cleveland Clinic Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.

Objective: To quantify objective and subjective outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients with asymmetric hearing loss, including single-sided deafness (SSD) whose candidacy was determined on an ear-specific basis when word recognition was 50% or less.

Study Design: Retrospective case review.

Setting: Tertiary referral center. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
September 2022
Similar Publications

Endoscopic Medial Reepithelization for Inflammatory Canal Stenosis.

Authors:
Sonia M Scaria Aaron D Tward

Otol Neurotol 2022 Sep;43(8):973-977

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Objective: Inflammatory external auditory canal (EAC) Stenosis arises from infiltration of inflammatory cells, edema and eventual sclerosing of the medial EAC, leading to complete obstruction and conductive hearing loss. Current treatment includes surgical resection of the affected area with widening and reepithelization of the EAC via postauricular incision, but the condition is reported to recur with high frequency. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of endoscopic transcanal treatment as an alternative to postauricular canalplasty and understand its effect on recurrence rates. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
September 2022
Similar Publications

The Outcome of Cochlear Implantations in Deaf-Blind Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:
Ahmad Daneshi Hamed Sajjadi Nikolas Blevins Herman A Jenkins Mohammad Farhadi Mohammad Ajallouyan Seyed Basir Hashemi Anthony Thai Emma Tran Mohsen Rajati Alimohamad Asghari Mohammad Mohseni Saleh Mohebbi Arash Bayat Nader Saki Hesamaldin Emamdjomeh Maryam Romiani Farideh Hosseinzadeh Yasser Nasori Marjan Mirsaleh

Otol Neurotol 2022 Sep;43(8):908-914

ENT and Head & Neck Research Center, The Five Senses Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Objective: This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in deaf-blind patients compared with deaf-only patients.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Multiple cochlear implant centers. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
September 2022
Similar Publications
}
© 2022 PubFacts.
  • About PubFacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap