Contemporary trends in percutaneous renal mass biopsy utilization in the United States.

Urol Oncol 2020 Nov 7;38(11):835-843. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. Electronic address:

Introduction: Patients with a renal mass traditionally proceed directly to surgery without a preoperative tissue diagnosis confirming malignancy. Many surgically treated renal masses represent benign tumors or indolent malignancies on final pathology. This has led to a growing body of literature supporting an expanded role for percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB). This study aims to characterize national trends in RMB utilization.

Methods: Patients undergoing renal biopsy during a 12-year period (2006-2017) in the Premier Hospital Database were captured using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision codes. We restricted our analysis to patients with a concurrent diagnosis of a renal mass. We determined utilization rate, subsequent interventions within 90 days of biopsy, predictors of RMB, and 30-day RMB complication rates. We applied sampling weights and adjusted for hospital clustering to achieve a nationally representative analysis.

Results: Among 115,511 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the annual number of RMB rose from 7,196 in 2006 to 11,528 in 2017; during this period, more than 3 times as many patients proceeded directly to surgery without a prior RMB. After RMB, 85,848 (74.32%) patients were not treated within 90 days. Of those treated, thermal ablation was more common than surgery (17,269 vs. 12,394). Trend analysis showed that patients with metastatic disease represented a decreasing proportion of patients receiving RMB (27.0%-21.8%; P < 0.001). Compared to patients who proceeded directly to surgery, RMB was more commonly performed in patients in the highest age group (80 years and older, 15.9% vs. 9.2%), unmarried (50% vs. 45.9%), with more medical comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index ≥4, 30.9% vs. 17.4%), or with metastatic disease (24.5% vs. 10.4%). Multivariable regression analysis determined the primary predictor of RMB was the presence of metastatic disease. Hematuria was the most common complication present in 5.18% of patients followed by pneumothorax in 1.75%. All other complications were rare (<0.4%).

Conclusion: Although there has been progressive adoption of RMB for the management of renal masses in the United States, utilization remains relatively limited and differentially employed across the population based on both clinical and nonclinical patient factors. More research is needed to understand which factors are considered when determining whether to utilize RMB in the evaluation of a renal mass.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.022DOI Listing
November 2020

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

renal mass
16
directly surgery
12
metastatic disease
12
patients
11
rmb
10
mass biopsy
8
proceeded directly
8
patients proceeded
8
analysis patients
8
percutaneous renal
8
renal
6
7196 2006
4
2006 11528
4
11528 2017
4
2017 period
4
rmb rose
4
annual number
4
criteria annual
4
number rmb
4
period times
4

Similar Publications

Utilization and Operative Influence of Renal Mass Biopsy in the Small Renal Mass: Analysis from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Small Renal Mass registry.

J Endourol 2020 01 30;34(1):99-106. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Definitive inclusion of renal mass biopsy (RMB) in small renal mass (SRM) diagnostic algorithm remains controversial. We assessed incidence and accuracy of RMB in SRMs in the CROES Renal Mass registry and the influence of preoperative RMB on perioperative complications after SRM nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). "" description of incidence of preoperative RMB and characteristics of SRM cases with and without RMB. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
January 2020

Utilization of renal mass biopsy in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: A population-based study utilizing the National Cancer Database.

Urol Oncol 2021 Jan 5;39(1):79.e1-79.e8. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA. Electronic address:

Objective: To evaluate trends and factors predicting use of renal mass biopsy (RMB) for localized Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States (US) in the context of current guidelines recommendations.

Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database for cT1-cT3N0M0 Renal Cell Carcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Temporal trends of RMB were characterized based on tumor size, treatment (partial nephrectomy [PN], radical nephrectomy [RN], ablation, and no treatment), age and Charlson Comorbidity Index with slopes compared using analysis of variance. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
January 2021

Utilization of renal mass biopsy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Urology 2014 Apr 12;83(4):774-9. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.

Objective: To examine the patient, tumor, and temporal factors associated with receipt of renal mass biopsy (RMB) in a contemporary nationally representative sample.

Methods: We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data set for incident cases of renal cell carcinoma diagnosed between 1992 and 2007. We tested for associations among receipt of RMB and patient and tumor characteristics, type of therapy, and procedure type. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
April 2014

Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.

Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018 07;43(7):1813-1819

The Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Purpose: To determine the efficacy, safety and clinical utility of CT and US-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study of a cohort of 183 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous, CT or US-guided renal mass biopsy (RMB) from March 2002 through December 2012 was performed. RMB was performed in 183 consecutive patients for suspected solid renal mass of whom 14/183 (7. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
July 2018