Stroke rate after endovascular aortic interventions in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

J Vasc Surg 2020 Nov 2;72(5):1593-1601. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass. Electronic address:

Objective: The stroke rate after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), particularly complex EVAR such as fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) and chimney EVAR (chEVAR), is not well defined. Whereas stroke is a well-established risk of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), the impact of procedural characteristics on stroke remains unclear. Therefore, we characterized the risk of stroke after endovascular aortic interventions in the Vascular Quality Initiative database and identified procedural characteristics associated with stroke.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing infrarenal EVAR, complex EVAR, and TEVAR within the Vascular Quality Initiative between 2011 and 2019. Complex EVAR included FEVAR (with either a Food and Drug Administration-approved custom-manufactured device or physician-modified endovascular graft) and chEVAR. We excluded emergent procedures. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify procedural characteristics associated with stroke.

Results: We identified 41,540 EVARs, 1371 complex EVARs, and 4600 TEVARs. The in-hospital stroke rate was 0.1% after EVAR, 0.9% after complex EVAR, and 2.9% after TEVAR. In patients undergoing EVAR, aneurysm diameter >6.5 mm (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7; P = .03) and use of a proximal extension cuff (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.9; P < .01) were independently associated with stroke. Among complex EVARs, stroke rate was 0.7% after FEVAR with a custom-manufactured device, 0.4% after FEVAR with a physician-modified endovascular graft, and 2.1% after chEVAR (P = .08). In multivariable analysis, arm access was associated with 8.4-fold higher odds of stroke (95% CI, 1.7-41; P < .01). Whereas chEVAR was associated with higher odds of stroke in crude analysis, this association did not persist after adjustment for arm access (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.2-4.4; P = .99). In patients undergoing TEVAR, more proximal landing zones were associated with higher risk of stroke compared with zone 4/5 (zone 3: OR, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.9-4.2]; zone 2: OR, 3.8 [95% CI, 1.8-8.2]; zone 0/1: OR, 6.3 [95% CI, 2.8-14]). In terms of procedural characteristics, any involvement of the left subclavian artery was associated with stroke (bypass: OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.5-4.0]; stent: OR, 2.7 [95% CI, 0.9-8.5]; covered or occluded: OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.5-4.1]).

Conclusions: Stroke, although rare after elective EVAR, is substantially more common after complex EVAR and TEVAR. Increasing procedural complexity in complex EVAR and TEVAR is associated with a higher stroke rate, a risk that should be factored into clinical decision-making. The strong association between stroke and upper extremity access during complex EVAR is alarming and warrants further study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.015DOI Listing
November 2020

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

complex evar
28
stroke rate
20
procedural characteristics
16
stroke
16
evar
14
quality initiative
12
associated higher
12
vascular quality
12
evar tevar
12
patients undergoing
12
endovascular aortic
12
complex
9
associated
8
risk stroke
8
custom-manufactured device
8
evar complex
8
complex evars
8
associated stroke
8
characteristics associated
8
higher odds
8

Similar Publications

The state of complex endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

J Vasc Surg 2019 08 2;70(2):369-380. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass. Electronic address:

Background: Endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms has become increasingly common, but reports have mostly been limited to single centers and single devices.

Methods: We studied all endovascular repairs of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (zone 6 or caudal) from 2014 to 2018 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. This included all commercially available fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), chimney/snorkel repairs, and physician-modified endografts (PMEGs), exclusive of investigational device exemptions and clinical trial devices. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
August 2019

Fenestrated endovascular grafts for the repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2009 1;9(4):1-51. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

Unlabelled: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) allows the exclusion of the dilated aneurismal segment of the aorta from the systematic circulation. The procedure requires, however, that the endograft extends to the healthy parts of the aorta above and below the aneurysm, yet the neck of a juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (JRA) is too short for a standard endovascular repair. Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR) provides a solution to overcome this problem by enabling the continuation of blood flow to the renal and visceral arteries through holes or 'fenestrations' in the graft. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
October 2012

Outcomes and cost of fenestrated versus standard endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States.

J Vasc Surg 2019 Apr 3;69(4):1036-1044.e1. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

Johns Hopkins Bayview Vascular and Endovascular Clinical Research Center, Baltimore, Md. Electronic address:

Background: Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) has expanded the indications of this minimally invasive procedure to include patients with pararenal aneurysms. The actual cost of this relatively newer technology compared with standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has not been studied before. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze in-hospital costs and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing FEVAR vs EVAR for intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
April 2019

Preoperative risk score for access site failure in ultrasound-guided percutaneous aortic procedures.

J Vasc Surg 2019 10 7;70(4):1254-1262.e1. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass. Electronic address:

Objective: The factors associated with access site failure after ultrasound-guided percutaneous access for aortic endograft procedures remain poorly characterized. We developed a prediction model to risk stratify patients for access site failure.

Methods: We performed a retrospective institutional review of consecutive patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR), or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) from 2014 to 2016. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
October 2019