Clinical usefulness of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for evaluating biliary anatomy in living donor liver transplantation.

Eur Radiol 2019 Dec 21;29(12):6508-6518. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, and Departments of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.

Objectives: To determine the incremental value of hepatobiliary-phase-MRC (HBP-MRC) added to T2-magnetic resonance cholangiography (T2-MRC) for evaluating biliary anatomy in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to correlate T2+HBP-MRC findings with surgical results.

Methods: A total of 276 donors who underwent T2 and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI before right hemihepatectomy for LDLT between January and December 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. Two reviewers evaluated biliary anatomy classification using T2-MRC in the first session and T2+HBP-MRC in the second session. The sensitivity, specificity, and confidence level (5-point scale) of T2-MRC and T2+HBP-MRC for variant biliary anatomy were evaluated. The agreement rates between MRC and operative cholangiography for each biliary anatomy classification and the underestimation rates for multiple bile duct openings (BDOs) for both MRC techniques were evaluated.

Results: Of the 276 donors, variant biliary anatomy was observed in 36.2% (100/276). T2+HBP-MRC showed a significantly higher sensitivity for diagnosing variant biliary anatomy than T2-MRC alone (99.0% [99/100] vs. 89.0% [89/100], p = 0.006), with better observer confidence level (4.9 ± 0.3 vs. 4.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) and inter-observer agreement (kappa, 0.902 vs. 0.730). Compared with T2-MRC alone, T2+HBP-MRC provided significantly higher agreement with operative cholangiography in biliary anatomy classification (98.6% [272/276] vs. 89.9% [248/276], p < 0.001), and significantly lower underestimation rate for multiple BDOs (5.8% [16/276] vs. 9.4% [26/276], p = 0.002).

Conclusion: T2+HBP-MRC might be considered than T2-MRC alone, as a better depiction of biliary anatomic variations, correlated with surgical findings.

Key Points: •T2+HBP-MRC predicted variant biliary anatomy more accurately than T2-MRC alone. •T2+HBP-MRC might have clinical usefulness by reducing the underestimation rate of multiple bile duct openings, which requires more complicated biliary anastomoses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06292-8DOI Listing
December 2019
Save 15% Survey

Similar Publications

Additional values of high-resolution gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR cholangiography for evaluating the biliary anatomy of living liver donors: Comparison with T -weighted MR cholangiography and conventional gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR cholangiography.

J Magn Reson Imaging 2018 01 11;47(1):152-159. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Purpose: To determine the incremental value of small field of view (sFOV) high-resolution (HR) gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3D T -weighted (W) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) for evaluating the biliary anatomy of potential living donors by comparing it to T W-MRC.

Materials And Methods: In all, 73 living donor candidates underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (3.0T) including three kinds of MRCs: 3D multislice T W-MRC, regular FOV (rFOV) (380 × 380mm, resolution 1. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
January 2018

Comparison of gadoxetic acid to gadobenate dimeglumine for assessment of biliary anatomy of potential liver donors.

Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016 07;41(7):1300-9

Department of Radiology, Body MRI, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.

Purpose: To compare MRI using gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) vs. gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) for the assessment of biliary anatomy of potential liver donors.

Methods: 76 potential liver donors (39 M/37 F, mean 38 years) who underwent 1. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
July 2016

Clinical Feasibility of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Isotropic High-Resolution 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography Using an Iterative Denoising Algorithm for Evaluation of the Biliary Anatomy of Living Liver Donors.

Invest Radiol 2019 02;54(2):103-109

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced isotropic high-resolution (IHR) 3-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted (T1W) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) using an iterative denoising (ID) algorithm for evaluation of the biliary anatomy of living liver donors in comparison with conventional 3D multislice T2-weighted (T2W) MRC.

Materials And Methods: In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, a total of 75 living liver donors who underwent conventional 3D multislice T2W-MRC and IHR-3D-T1W-MRC on a 3 T scanner and subsequent right hepatectomy for liver donation were included. Isotropic high-resolution T1W-MRCs were obtained in both axial and coronal planes using the 3D VIBE Dixon sequence and an ID algorithm implemented with wavelet thresholding of 3D complex-valued data of the noise level, g-factor, and k-space filtering. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
February 2019

High spatial resolution navigated 3D T1-weighted hepatobiliary MR cholangiography using Gd-EOB-DTPA for evaluation of biliary anatomy in living liver donors.

Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018 07;43(7):1703-1712

Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, 164, World-cup Ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea.

Purpose: To determine the feasibility of high-resolution navigated three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted hepatobiliary MR cholangiography (Nav T1 MRC) using Gd-EOB-DTPA for biliary visualization in living liver donors and to assess added value of 3D T1-weighted hepatobiliary MRCs in improving the confidence and diagnostic accuracy of biliary anatomy in complementary to T2-weighted MRCs.

Methods: Twenty-nine right liver donors underwent 3D T2 MRC, 2D T2 MRC, breath-hold T1-weighted hepatobiliary MRC (BH T1 MRC), and Nav T1 MRC. Two readers independently reviewed and compared 3D/2D MRC set, added BH T1 MRC set, and added Nav T1 MRC set for biliary diagnostic accuracy and confidence. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
July 2018