[What replaces the locked door? : Conceptual and ethical considerations regarding open door policies, formal coercion and treatment pressures].

Nervenarzt 2019 Jul;90(7):690-694

Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Alexandrinenstr. 1-3, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.

Background: Mental health professionals use various strategies to prevent involuntarily committed persons from absconding under an open door policy.

Objective: To provide an ethical framework for the evaluation of the replacement of locked ward doors by formal coercion or treatment pressures.

Methods: Empirically informed conceptual and ethical analysis.

Results: The replacement of locked ward doors by formal coercive measures applied to individual persons, such as mechanical restraint or seclusion, is ethically problematic. The use of treatment pressures, for example in the context of intensified observational measures, requires a differentiated ethical evaluation and does not necessarily constitute the milder means in comparison to locked ward doors.

Conclusion: Unexplored conceptual, empirical and ethical issues surrounding open door policies and treatment pressures should be clarified by means of psychiatric and ethical research. In clinical practice, the choice of the least burdensome and least restrictive measures for involuntarily committed persons should be facilitated by appropriate ethical support services.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-019-0717-3DOI Listing
July 2019
1 Read

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

open door
12
locked ward
12
doors formal
8
ward doors
8
door policies
8
involuntarily committed
8
coercion treatment
8
formal coercion
8
replacement locked
8
committed persons
8
treatment pressures
8
conceptual ethical
8
ethical
7
a differentiated ethical
4
practice choice
4
empirically informed
4
informed conceptual
4
analysisresults replacement
4
ethical analysisresults
4
measures requires
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

KH Beine et al.
Psychiatr. Prax. 2016

J Gather et al.
R&P 2017

T Henking et al.
R&P 2017

L Hochstrasser et al.
Eur Psychiatry 2018

F Hotzy et al.
Front Psychiatry 2016

J Kalagi et al.
BMC Psychiatry 2018

U Lang et al.
2013

A Nienaber et al.
Psychiat Prax 2013

PW Nyhuis et al.
2017

T Pollmächer et al.
Lancet Psychiatry 2016

T Schramme et al.
2017

Similar Publications