Stereoisomer-specific occurrence, distribution, and fate of chiral brominated flame retardants in different wastewater treatment systems in Hong Kong.

Authors:
Yuefei Ruan
Yuefei Ruan
Nankai University
China
Kai Zhang
Kai Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition
China

J Hazard Mater 2019 Jul 13;374:211-218. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution (SKLMP), Research Centre for the Oceans and Human Health, Shenzhen Key Laboratory for the Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Department of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. Electronic address:

This study investigated the occurrence and fate of 1,2,5,6,9,10-hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) and 1,2-dibromo-4-(1,2-dibromoethyl)cyclohexane (TBECH), two chiral brominated flame retardants (BFRs) with sixteen different stereoisomers, in four Hong Kong wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) featuring diverse treatment processes during a two-year sampling campaign. More effective HBCD removal was achieved via biodegradation as compared to sludge sorption, whereas both chemically enhanced primary treatment and secondary treatment yielded high TBECH elimination (>90%). α-HBCD (54-75%) predominated in all samples, and its proportions were increased in effluent as compared to influent and sludge. α- and β-TBECH (72.3-84.4% in total) were the predominant TBECH diastereomers, with a proportional shift from the latter to the former diastereomer mostly observed after treatment. More rapid biodegradation and preferential sorption of γ-HBCD as compared to α-HBCD as well as β-TBECH as compared to α-TBECH might account for this changing pattern. This is the first study to report the enantiomer-specific behavior of chiral BFRs in different wastewater treatment processes. A preferential elimination of (+)-α- and (+)-γ-HBCD and E-β-TBECH (the second enantiomeric elution order) took place consistently after biological treatment, possibly due to enantioselective adsorption and microbial degradation. Our results highlight the importance of conducting enantiospecific analysis for chiral pollutants in wastewater samples.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.041DOI Listing
July 2019
2 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wastewater treatment
12
hong kong
8
flame retardants
8
treatment
8
chiral brominated
8
treatment processes
8
brominated flame
8
predominated samples
4
second enantiomeric
4
α- β-tbech
4
54-75% predominated
4
order place
4
β-tbech 723-844%
4
α-hbcd 54-75%
4
samples proportions
4
elution order
4
compared influent
4
effluent compared
4
increased effluent
4
influent sludge
4

Similar Publications