Meta-Analysis: 13-Year Follow-Up of Psychotherapy Effects on Youth Depression.

Authors:
Dikla Eckshtain
Dikla Eckshtain
Judge Baker Children's Center and Harvard University
United States
Sofie Kuppens
Sofie Kuppens
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Belgium
Ana Ugueto
Ana Ugueto
McGovern Medical School
Katherine Corteselli
Katherine Corteselli
Harvard University
John R Weisz
John R Weisz
University of California
United States

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019 Apr 17. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

Objective: Youth depression is a debilitating condition that constitutes a major public health concern. A 2006 meta-analysis found modest benefits for psychotherapy vs. control. Has 13 more years of research improved that picture? We sought to find out.

Method: We searched PubMed, PsychINFO, and Dissertation Abstracts International for 1960-2017, identifying 655 randomized, English-language psychotherapy trials for ages 4-18 years. Of these, 55 assessed psychotherapy versus control for youth depression with outcome measures administered to both treatment and control conditions at post (k=53) and/or follow-up (k=32). Twelve study and outcome characteristics were extracted, and effect sizes were calculated for all psychotherapy vs. control comparisons. Using a three-level random-effects model, we obtained an overall estimate of the psychotherapy vs. control difference while accounting for the dependency among effect sizes. We then fitted a three-level mixed-effects model to identify moderators that might explain variation in effect size within and between studies.

Results: Overall effect size (g) was 0.36 at posttreatment, 0.21 at follow-up (averaging 42 weeks after post-treatment). Three moderator effects were identified: effects were significantly larger for Interpersonal Therapy than CBT, for youth self-reported outcomes than parent-reports, and for comparisons with inactive control conditions (e.g., waitlist) than active controls (e.g., usual care). Effects showed specificity, with significantly smaller effects for anxiety and externalizing behavior outcomes than for depression measures.

Conclusion: Youth depression psychotherapy effects are modest, with no significant change over the past 13 years. The findings highlight the need for treatment development and research to improve both immediate and longer-term benefits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S08908567193026
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.04.002DOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
April 2019
10 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

youth depression
16
psychotherapy control
12
psychotherapy effects
8
control conditions
8
psychotherapy
7
effects
6
control
6
depression
5
youth
5
sizes fitted
4
dependency sizes
4
moderators explain
4
identify moderators
4
model identify
4
explain variation
4
fitted three-level
4
mixed-effects model
4
three-level mixed-effects
4
size 036
4
021 follow-up
4

Similar Publications