Assessing Cyberbiosecurity Vulnerabilities and Infrastructure Resilience.

Authors:
Daniel S Schabacker
Daniel S Schabacker
Argonne National Laboratory
Leslie-Anne Levy
Leslie-Anne Levy
Argonne National Laboratory (DOE)

Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019 29;7:61. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

Argonne National Laboratory (DOE), Strategic Security Sciences Division, Lemont, IL, United States.

The convergence of advances in biotechnology with laboratory automation, access to data, and computational biology has democratized biotechnology and accelerated the development of new therapeutics. However, increased access to biotechnology in the digital age has also introduced additional security concerns and ultimately, spawned the new discipline of cyberbiosecurity, which encompasses cybersecurity, cyber-physical security, and biosecurity considerations. With the emergence of this new discipline comes the need for a logical, repeatable, and shared approach for evaluating facility and system vulnerabilities to cyberbiosecurity threats. In this paper, we outline the foundation of an assessment framework for cyberbiosecurity, accounting for both security and resilience factors in the physical and cyber domains. This is a unique problem set, but despite the complexity of the cyberbiosecurity field in terms of operations and governance, previous experience developing and implementing physical and cyber assessments applicable to a wide spectrum of critical infrastructure sectors provides a validated point of departure for a cyberbiosecurity assessment framework. This approach proposes to integrate existing capabilities and proven methodologies from the infrastructure assessment realm (e.g., decision science, physical security, infrastructure resilience, cybersecurity) with new expertise and requirements in the cyberbiosecurity space (e.g., biotechnology, biomanufacturing, genomics) in order to forge a flexible and defensible approach to identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities. Determining where vulnerabilities reside within cyberbiosecurity business processes can help public and private sector partners create an assessment framework to identify mitigation options for consideration that are both economically and practically viable and ultimately, allow them to manage risk more effectively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00061
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00061DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6455068PMC
March 2019
3 Reads

Article Mentions


Provided by Crossref Event Data
twitter
Twitter:
March 30, 2019, 1:25 pm EST
twitter
Twitter:
March 29, 2019, 3:05 pm EST

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

assessment framework
12
infrastructure resilience
8
physical cyber
8
cyberbiosecurity
7
despite complexity
4
vulnerabilities reside
4
complexity cyberbiosecurity
4
set despite
4
unique problem
4
cyberbiosecurity business
4
problem set
4
reside cyberbiosecurity
4
cyberbiosecurity field
4
governance previous
4
mitigating vulnerabilities
4
previous experience
4
identifying mitigating
4
operations governance
4
vulnerabilities determining
4
field terms
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Information Technology Social Engineering: An Academic Definition and Study of Social Engineering-Analyzing The Human Firewall.
Evans et al.
Information Technology Social Engineering: An Academic Definition and Study of Social Engineering-Analyzing The Human Firewall. 2009
Article in Constructing Vulnerability and Protective Measures Indices for the Enhanced Critical Infrastructure Protection Program
Fisher et al.
Constructing Vulnerability and Protective Measures Indices for the Enhanced Critical Infrastructure Protection Program 2009

Keeney et al.
1976

Kenney et al.
1992
Cyberbiosecurity: from naive trust to risk awareness
Peccoud et al.
Trends Biotechnol. 2017
Article in Resilience Measurement Index: An Indicator of Critical Infrastructure Resilience.
Petit et al.
Resilience Measurement Index: An Indicator of Critical Infrastructure Resilience.
Article in Protective Measures Index and Vulnerability Index: Indicators of Critical Infrastructure Protection and Vulnerability.
Petit et al.
Protective Measures Index and Vulnerability Index: Indicators of Critical Infrastructure Protection and Vulnerability.
Article in Analysis of Critical Infrastructure Dependencies and Interdependencies.
Petit et al.
Analysis of Critical Infrastructure Dependencies and Interdependencies. 2015

Similar Publications