Coverage of ethics within the artificial intelligence and machine learning academic literature: The case of disabled people.

Authors:
Gregor Wolbring
Gregor Wolbring
University of Calgary
Canada

Assist Technol 2019 Apr 17:1-7. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

a Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine , University of Calgary , Calgary , Alberta , Canada.

Disabled people are often the anticipated users of scientific and technological products and processes advanced and enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). Disabled people are also impacted by societal impacts of AI/ML. Many ethical issues are identified within AI/ML as fields and within individual applications of AI/ML. At the same time, problems have been identified in how ethics discourses engage with disabled people. The aim of our scoping review was to better understand to what extent and how the AI/ML focused academic literature engaged with the ethics of AI/ML in relation to disabled people. Of the n = 1659 abstracts engaging with AI/ML and ethics downloaded from Scopus (which includes all Medline articles) and the 70 databases of EBSCO ALL, we found 54 relevant abstracts using the term "patient" and 11 relevant abstracts mentioning terms linked to "impair*", "disab*" and "deaf". Our study suggests a gap in the literature that should be filled given the many AI/ML related ethical issues identified in the literature and their impact on disabled people.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1593259DOI Listing
April 2019
1 Read

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disabled people
24
machine learning
8
ethical issues
8
ai/ml ethical
8
intelligence machine
8
academic literature
8
relevant abstracts
8
issues identified
8
artificial intelligence
8
ai/ml
7
disabled
6
people
6
discourses engage
4
engage disabled
4
better understand
4
review better
4
linked "impair*"
4
aim scoping
4
scoping review
4
terms linked
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in The Qualitative Report
Baxter P. et al.
The Qualitative Report 2008

Bendel O. et al.
2018

Similar Publications