Gravity of the non-authorized use of substances not intended for clinical use in invasive aesthetic procedures: the portuguese case.

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2019 Mar 11;65(3):410-418. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

Doctorate in Social Sciences (specialized in Public Administration), Technical University of Lisbon (UTL), Lisbon, Portugal.

Introduction: There is a worldwide increase in the number of invasive aesthetic procedures, and there is a general apprehension in medical societies towards the assurance of patient safety, that is dependent on the quality and certification of providers, of the materials and substances used, and where they take place.It is the main objective of this study to determine the perception of the gravity of non-authorized substances for clinical use in invasive aesthetic procedures among Portuguese plastic surgeons and its variation by the clinical sector of practice.

Methods: We proceeded to an inquiry by using a questionnaire, measured in a Linkert scale, and the collected data were statistically treated with a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: We obtained a 41,4% answer rate and a global perception that this is a serious problem - a median of 8,00 and mean of 7,45 points on a 1 to 10 scale. 70% of the plastic surgeons that answered the questionnaire work both in the private and public sector, 19% exclusively in the public sector and 11% only in private practice. The perception of the problem was most serious among those that work exclusively in the private sector (statistically significant difference).

Conclusion: The causes of the observed difference may reside in various reasons: the higher number of patients submitted to invasive aesthetic procedures exclusively in private practice; the higher perception of regulatory deficits in the private sector; scarce specific health politics for procedures outside the traditional boundaries of medicine; the difficulty for independent regulatory agencies to adopt effective measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.410DOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
March 2019
1 Read

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aesthetic procedures
16
invasive aesthetic
16
procedures portuguese
8
private sector
8
private practice
8
plastic surgeons
8
public sector
8
clinical invasive
8
exclusively private
8
gravity non-authorized
8
non-authorized substances
8
sector
5
private
5
procedures
5
sector 11%
4
surgeons answered
4
70% plastic
4
scale 70%
4
745 points
4
points scale
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal WH et al.
J Am Stat Assoc. 1952
Administração hospitalar em Portugal: relação entre antiguidade e envolvimento laboral, e implicações para o risco de saída
Correia P et al.
J Bras Econ da Saúde. 2016
Receitas fiscais e tributação geral sobre o consumo em Portugal : um estudo sobre eventuais assimetrias do comportamento dos sujeitos passivos do imposto no final da primeira década do século XXI [Tax Revenue and General Taxation on Consumption in Portuga
Catarino J et al.
Rev da FAE. 2016
Ingreso Bruto Tributable del IVA: Evidencia de Diferenciación de los Municipios de la Costa Portuguesa [Gross Revenue for VAT Tax: Evidence of Differentiation at the Portuguese Littoral Municipalities]
Correia P et al.
Rev del CLAD Reforma y Democr. 2016
Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment, Part II: Continued positive results for civil enforcement actions in Troika's aftermath
Correia P et al.
Int J Court Adm. 2016

Grotting JC et al.
2012
Current status of liquid injectable silicone
Goulian D et al.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1978

2016

2016

Similar Publications