A mixed-methods approach to understanding partnership experiences and outcomes of projects from an integrated knowledge translation funding model in rehabilitation.

Authors:
Sara Ahmed
Sara Ahmed
McGill University
Canada
Aliki Thomas
Aliki Thomas
McGill University
Canada

BMC Health Serv Res 2019 Apr 16;19(1):230. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Background: Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) can optimize the uptake of research evidence into clinical practice by incorporating knowledge users as equal partners in the entire research process. Although several studies have investigated stakeholder involvement in research, the literature on partnerships between researchers and clinicians in rehabilitation and their impact on clinical practice is scarce. This study described the individual research projects, the outcomes of these projects on clinical practice and the partnership experiences of an initiative that funds IKT projects co-led by a rehabilitation clinician and a researcher.

Methods: This was a sequential explanatory mixed methods study where quantitative data (document reviews and surveys) informed the qualitative phase (focus groups with researchers and interviews with clinicians). Descriptive analysis was completed for the quantitative data and thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data.

Results: 53 projects were classified within multiple steps of the KTA framework. Descriptive information on the projects and outcomes were obtained through the survey for 37 of the 53 funded projects (70%). Half of the respondents (n = 18) were very satisfied or satisfied with their project's impact. Only two (6%) projects reported having measured sustainability of their projects and four (11%) measured long-term impact. A focus group with six researchers and individual interviews with nine clinicians highlighted the benefits (e.g. acquired collaborative skills, stronger networks between clinicians and academia) and challenges (e.g. measuring KT outcomes, lack of planning for sustainability, barriers related to clinician involvement in research) of participating in this initiative. Considerations when partnering on IKT projects included: the importance of having a supportive organization culture and physical proximity between collaborators, sharing motives for participating, leveraging everyone's expertise, grounding projects in KT models, discussing feasibility of projects on a restricted timeline, and incorporating the necessary knowledge users. Clinicians discussed the main outputs (scientific contribution, training and development, increased awareness of best practice, step in a larger effort) as project outcomes, but highlighted the complexity of measuring outcomes on clinical practice.

Conclusion: The study provides a portrait of an IKT funding model, sheds light on past IKT projects' strengths and weaknesses and provides strategies for promoting positive partnership experiences between researchers and rehabilitation clinicians.

Download full-text PDF

Source
https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4061-xDOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469130PMC
April 2019
3 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

partnership experiences
12
clinical practice
12
projects
12
knowledge translation
8
integrated knowledge
8
measuring outcomes
8
knowledge users
8
incorporating knowledge
8
quantitative data
8
ikt projects
8
projects outcomes
8
funding model
8
interviews clinicians
8
outcomes projects
8
clinicians
6
outcomes
6
ikt
5
clinicians highlighted
4
participating initiative
4
highlighted benefits
4

Altmetric Statistics

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Arch Phys Med Rehabil
D Backus et al.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013
Article in Arch Phys Med Rehabil
SJ Bowen et al.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013
Article in Disabil Rehabil
C Camden et al.
Disabil Rehabil 2015
Article in J Rehabil Med
A Menon et al.
J Rehabil Med 2009
Article in J Rehabil Med
N Korner-Bitensky et al.
J Rehabil Med 2008
Article in Phys Occup Ther Pediatr
M Ketelaar et al.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2008
Article in Occup Ther Int
KAV Cameron et al.
Occup Ther Int 2005
Article in Occup Ther Health Care
J Salls et al.
Occup Ther Health Care 2009
Article in Phys Occup Ther Pediatr
D Anaby et al.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2017
Article in Phys Occup Ther Pediatr
G Taflampas et al.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2018
Article in J Health Serv Res Policy
K Golden-Biddle et al.
J Health Serv Res Policy 2003

Similar Publications