Medical education today: all that glitters is not gold.

BMC Med Educ 2019 Apr 16;19(1):110. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), 6431 Fannin St., MSB2.276, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.

Background: The medical education system based on principles advocated by Flexner and Osler has produced generations of scientifically grounded and clinically skilled physicians whose collective experiences and contributions have served medicine and patients well. Yet sweeping changes launched around the turn of the millennium have constituted a revolution in medical education. In this article, a critique is presented of the new undergraduate medical education (UME) curricula in relationship to graduate medical education (GME) and clinical practice.

Discussion: Medical education has changed and will continue to change in response to scientific advances and societal needs. However, enthusiasm for reform needs to be tempered by a more measured approach to avoid unintended consequences. Movement from novice to master in medicine cannot be rushed. An argument is made for a shoring up of biomedical science in revised curricula with the beneficiaries being nascent practitioners, developing physician-scientists --and the public.

Conclusion: Unless there is further modification, the new integrated curricula are at risk of produce graduates deficient in the characteristics that have set physicians apart from other healthcare professionals, namely high-level clinical expertise based on a deep grounding in biomedical science and understanding of the pathologic basis of disease. The challenges for education of the best possible physicians are great but the benefits to medicine and society are enormous.

Download full-text PDF

Source
https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1535-9DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469033PMC
April 2019
6 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medical education
24
biomedical science
8
education
6
medical
6
movement novice
4
novice master
4
measured approach
4
consequences movement
4
unintended consequences
4
master medicine
4
approach avoid
4
avoid unintended
4
medicine rushed
4
revised curricula
4
curricula beneficiaries
4
beneficiaries nascent
4
science revised
4
shoring biomedical
4
rushed argument
4
argument shoring
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Texas Med
CM Gutierrez et al.
Texas Med 2016
Article in Medical Teacher
Dujeepa D. Samarasekera et al.
Medical Teacher 2018
Article in Psychiatr Q
PG Shelton et al.
Psychiatr Q 2017
Article in Perspect Med Educ
G Norman et al.
Perspect Med Educ 2012
Article in Postgrad Med J
TJ Ryan et al.
Postgrad Med J 2015
Article in JAMA
FL Brancati et al.
JAMA 1992
Article in Trans Am Clin Climatol Assn
TH Lee et al.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assn 2016

JB Richmond et al.
2005
Article in New England Journal of Medicine
Molly Cooke et al.
New England Journal of Medicine 2006
Article in Acad Med
CM Irby et al.
Acad Med 2010
Article in Lancet.
J Frenk et al.
Lancet. 2010

Similar Publications