Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction.

Authors:
Sepand Alavifard
Sepand Alavifard
Clinical Epidemiology Program
Kennedy Meier
Kennedy Meier
Mount Sinai Hospital
George Tomlinson
George Tomlinson
University of Toronto
Canada

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019 Apr 16;19(1):130. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Background: There is high-quality evidence supporting induction of labour (IOL) for a number of maternal and fetal indications. However, one fifth of inductions fail to result in vaginal births, requiring cesarean deliveries. This has negative clinical, emotional and resource implications. The importance of predicting the success of labour induction to enable shared decision-making has been recognized, but existing models are limited in scope and generalizability. Our objective was to derive and internally validate a clinical prediction model that uses variables readily accessible through maternal demographic data, antenatal history, and cervical examination to predict the likelihood of vaginal birth following IOL.

Methods: Data was extracted from electronic medical records of consecutive pregnant women who were induced between April and December 2016, at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed using 16 readily accessible variables identified through literature review and expert opinion, as predictors of vaginal birth after IOL. The final model was internally validated using 10-fold cross-validation.

Results: Of the 1123 cases of IOL, 290 (25.8%) resulted in a cesarean delivery. The multivariable logistic regression model found maternal age, parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index and weight, weight at delivery, and cervical dilation at time of induction as significant predictors of vaginal delivery following IOL. The prediction model was well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 5.02, p = 0.76) and demonstrated good discriminatory ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, 0.81 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.83)). Finally, the model showed good internal validity [AUROC 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82)].

Conclusions: We have derived and internally validated a well-performing clinical prediction model for IOL in a large and diverse population using variables readily accessible through maternal demographic data, antenatal history, and cervical examination. Once prospectively validated in diverse settings, and if shown to be acceptable to pregnant women and healthcare providers as well as clinically and cost-effective, this model has potential for widespread use in clinical practice and research for enhancing patient autonomy, improving induction outcomes, and optimizing allocation of resources.

Download full-text PDF

Source
https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2232-8DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469110PMC

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
April 2019
12 Reads

Article Mentions


Provided by Crossref Event Data
twitter
Twitter:
April 21, 2019, 3:28 pm EST
twitter
Twitter:
April 21, 2019, 12:15 am EST
twitter
Twitter:
April 17, 2019, 10:00 pm EST
twitter
Twitter:
April 17, 2019, 9:46 pm EST
twitter
Twitter:
April 17, 2019, 11:53 am EST
datacite
Datacite: Datacite
April 17, 2019, 12:00 am EST

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prediction model
12
vaginal birth
12
model
9
accessible maternal
8
variables accessible
8
demographic data
8
data antenatal
8
maternal demographic
8
clinical prediction
8
regression model
8
predictors vaginal
8
logistic regression
8
multivariable logistic
8
internally validated
8
labour induction
8
pregnant women
8
antenatal history
8
history cervical
8
cervical examination
8
likelihood vaginal
8

Similar Publications