Supporting Data vs Patient Requests in Oncology: When the Two Don't Coincide.

Authors:
Mehmet Sitki Copur
Mehmet Sitki Copur
Saint Francis Cancer Treatment Center
Greenville | United States

Oncology (Williston Park) 2019 04;33(4):156-8

Relationships between cancer patients and their oncologists flourish in a milieu of trust and goodwill. However, at times cancer patients may express strong preferences for medical tests, treatments, or other interventions that are not beneficial. Actively challenging these requests can be difficult and may threaten the patient-physician relationship. However, failure to discuss why specific diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are not appropriate may be harmful to the patient and lead to inefficient use or overuse of healthcare resources. It is therefore crucial that oncologists steer patients away from unnecessary or harmful tests and procedures in an eloquent and respectful manner. In addition to utilizing individualized clinical reasoning, clinicians can also consult clinical practice guidelines to help respond to these requests using an external source of authority. However, guidelines may not always be sufficient. This article reviews this topic and provides recommendations from a community oncology practice perspective.

Download full-text PDF

Source
April 2019
4 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer patients
8
therapeutic interventions
4
help respond
4
diagnostic therapeutic
4
respond requests
4
interventions appropriate
4
appropriate harmful
4
lead inefficient
4
guidelines help
4
patient lead
4
harmful patient
4
specific diagnostic
4
discuss specific
4
source authority
4
authority guidelines
4
requests difficult
4
challenging requests
4
threaten patient-physician
4
patient-physician relationship
4
requests external
4

Similar Publications