Ambulatory status after surgical and nonsurgical treatment for spinal metastasis.

Authors:
Andrew J Schoenfeld
Andrew J Schoenfeld
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
United States
Elena Losina
Elena Losina
Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research
Boston | United States
Marco L Ferrone
Marco L Ferrone
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston | United States
Joseph H Schwab
Joseph H Schwab
Massachusetts General Hospital
John H Chi
John H Chi
University of California
Justin A Blucher
Justin A Blucher
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Cancer 2019 Apr 15. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Background: Decisions for operative or nonoperative management remain challenging for patients with spinal metastases, especially when life expectancy and quality of life are not easily predicted. This study evaluated the effects of operative and nonoperative management on maintenance of ambulatory function and survival for patients treated for spinal metastases.

Methods: Propensity matching was used to yield an analytic sample in which operatively and nonoperatively treated patients were similar with respect to key baseline covariates. The study included patients treated for spinal metastases between 2005 and 2017 who were 40 to 80 years old, were independent ambulators at presentation, and had fewer than 5 medical comorbidities. It evaluated the influence of operative care and nonoperative care on ambulatory function 6 months after presentation as the primary outcome. Survival at 6 months and survival at 1 year were secondary outcomes.

Results: Nine hundred twenty-nine individuals eligible for inclusion were identified, with 402 (201 operative patients and 201 nonoperative patients) retained after propensity score matching. Patients treated operatively had a lower likelihood than those treated nonoperatively of being nonambulatory 6 months after presentation (3% vs 16%; relative risk [RR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.46) as well as a reduced risk of 6-month mortality (20% vs 29%; RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98).

Conclusions: These results indicate that in a group of patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics, those treated operatively were less likely to lose ambulatory function 6 months after presentation than those managed nonoperatively. For patients with spinal metastases, our data can be incorporated into discussions about the treatments that align best with patients' preferences regarding surgical risk, mortality, and ambulatory status.

Download full-text PDF

Source
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cncr.32140
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32140DOI Listing
April 2019
6 Reads
4.889 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal metastases
12
patients treated
12
ambulatory function
12
6 months presentation
12
patients
9
function 6 months
8
treated operatively
8
operative nonoperative
8
nonoperative management
8
treated spinal
8
patients spinal
8
ambulatory status
8
treated
6
ambulatory
5
spinal
5
identified 402
4
201 nonoperative
4
nonoperative patients
4
operative patients
4
201 operative
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

Similar Publications