A Structured, Debate-Style Cardiothoracic Surgery Journal Club for Trainee Acquisition and Application of Seminal Literature.

Authors:
Mara B Antonoff
Mara B Antonoff
University of Minnesota
United States
Tom C Nguyen
Tom C Nguyen
Stanford University School of Medicine
United States
Clara S Fowler
Clara S Fowler
The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
United States
Steven B Eisenberg
Steven B Eisenberg
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston | United States
Randall K Wolf
Randall K Wolf
International Atrial Fibrillation Center of Excellence
Anthony L Estrera
Anthony L Estrera
Memorial Hermann Heart and Vascular Institute
United States

MedEdPORTAL 2016 Dec 23;12:10521. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

Thoracic Surgeon, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Introduction: The acquisition of specialty-specific seminal literature and its application to daily, clinical patient-care decisions are critical components of clinical training. This structured, debate-style cardiothoracic surgery journal club module engages trainees in discussion of realistic patient scenarios, incorporating an extensive body of literature identified as the best evidence for the practice of cardiothoracic surgery.

Methods: We designed the structured, debate-style cardiothoracic surgery journal club and delivered it to University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center cardiothoracic surgery trainees. Overall assessment of knowledge acquisition consisted of both direct judging of debates by faculty facilitators and a year-end written test of trainee knowledge. Associated materials include guidelines and resources for faculty facilitators and trainees to prepare them for the journal club debate. Also included are cardiothoracic surgery patient cases, PowerPoint presentation slides, a debate score sheet, and multiple-choice knowledge tests with answer keys.

Results: Our structured, debate-style cardiothoracic surgery journal club is an effective educational intervention for cardiothoracic surgical trainees to gain practice in applying specialty-specific, literature-based evidence to particular patient problems.

Discussion: This resource may be used by course directors for surgery, for independent study by individuals planning to matriculate into surgical residencies, or as a review for those already in surgical training. Moreover, this curriculum can be delivered at other clinical training programs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10521DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440406PMC

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
December 2016
1 Read

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiothoracic surgery
24
journal club
20
debate-style cardiothoracic
16
surgery journal
16
structured debate-style
16
seminal literature
8
clinical training
8
cardiothoracic
8
faculty facilitators
8
surgery
7
club
5
journal
5
assessment knowledge
4
knowledge acquisition
4
trainees assessment
4
educational intervention
4
surgery trainees
4
center cardiothoracic
4
direct judging
4
cancer center
4

Similar Publications