Quality standards in respiratory real-life effectiveness research: the REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): report from the Respiratory Effectiveness Group-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force.

Clin Transl Allergy 2019 27;9:20. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

13Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, 60 Paya Lebar Road, Paya Lebar Square, #05-33/34, Singapore, 409051 Singapore.

Introduction: A Task Force was commissioned jointly by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG) to develop a quality assessment tool for real-life observational research to identify high-quality real-life asthma studies that could be considered within future guideline development.

Methods: The resulting REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT) was achieved through an extensive analysis of existing initiatives in this area. The first version was piloted among 9 raters across 6 articles; the revised, interim, version underwent extensive testing by 22 reviewers from the EAACI membership and REG collaborator group, leading to further revisions and tool finalisation. RELEVANT was validated through an analysis of real-life effectiveness studies identified via systematic review of Medline and Embase databases and relating to topics for which real-life studies may offer valuable evidence complementary to that from randomised controlled trials. The topics were selected through a vote among Task Force members and related to the influence of adherence, smoking, inhaler device and particle size on asthma treatment effectiveness.

Results: Although highlighting a general lack of high-quality real-life effectiveness observational research on these clinically important topics, the analysis provided insights into how identified observational studies might inform asthma guidelines developers and clinicians. Overall, RELEVANT appeared reliable and easy to use by expert reviewers.

Conclusions: Using such quality appraisal tools is mandatory to assess whether specific observational real-life effectiveness studies can be used to inform guideline development and/or decision-making in clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-019-0255-xDOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436229PMC

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
March 2019
1 Read

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

real-life effectiveness
16
task force
12
assessment tool
12
respiratory effectiveness
8
real life
8
life evidence
8
academy allergy
8
effectiveness studies
8
evidence assessment
8
tool relevant
8
high-quality real-life
8
allergy clinical
8
clinical immunology
8
studies inform
8
real-life
7
effectiveness
6
studies
5
offer valuable
4
studies offer
4
relating topics
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Lancet Respir Med
N Roche et al.
Lancet Respir Med 2013
Article in NPJ Prim Care Respir Med
K Lisspers et al.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2016
Article in Allergy
DB Price et al.
Allergy 2006
Article in Thorax
GW Chalmers et al.
Thorax 2002
Article in Eur Respir J
M Peters-Golden et al.
Eur Respir J 2006
Article in J Aerosol Med
M Molimard et al.
J Aerosol Med 2003
Article in Respir Med
V Giraud et al.
Respir Med 2011
Article in Thorax
J Travers et al.
Thorax 2007
Article in Curr Allergy Asthma Rep
D Price et al.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2011
Article in Ann Am Thorac Soc
D Price et al.
Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014
Article in J Allergy Clin Immunol
JA Krishnan et al.
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011

Similar Publications