A systematic review of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to promote physical activity.

Wendy Hardeman
Wendy Hardeman
Institute of Public Health
Bengaluru | India
Julie Houghton
Julie Houghton
Wageningen University
Kathleen Lane
Kathleen Lane
Indiana University School of Medicine
United States
Andy Jones
Andy Jones
Norwich Medical School
Felix Naughton
Felix Naughton
University of Cambridge
United Kingdom

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2019 04 3;16(1):31. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.

Background: Progress in mobile health (mHealth) technology has enabled the design of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs). We define JITAIs as having three features: behavioural support that directly corresponds to a need in real-time; content or timing of support is adapted or tailored according to input collected by the system since support was initiated; support is system-triggered. We conducted a systematic review of JITAIs for physical activity to identify their features, feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness.

Methods: We searched Scopus, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, DBLP, ACM Digital Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN register using terms related to physical activity, mHealth interventions and JITAIs. We included primary studies of any design reporting data about JITAIs, irrespective of population, age and setting. Outcomes included physical activity, engagement, uptake, feasibility and acceptability. Paper screening and data extraction were independently validated. Synthesis was narrative. We used the mHealth Evidence Reporting and Assessment checklist to assess quality of intervention descriptions.

Results: We screened 2200 titles, 840 abstracts, 169 full-text papers, and included 19 papers reporting 14 unique JITAIs, including six randomised studies. Five JITAIs targeted both physical activity and sedentary behaviour, five sedentary behaviour only, and four physical activity only. JITAIs prompted breaks following sedentary periods and/or suggested physical activities during opportunistic moments, typically over three to four weeks. Feasibility challenges related to the technology, sensor reliability and timeliness of just-in-time messages. Overall, participants found JITAIs acceptable. We found mixed evidence for intervention effects on behaviour, but no study was sufficiently powered to detect any effects. Common behaviour change techniques were goal setting (behaviour), prompts/cues, feedback on behaviour and action planning. Five studies reported a theory-base. We found lack of evidence about cost-effectiveness, uptake, reach, impact on health inequalities, and sustained engagement.

Conclusions: Research into JITAIs to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour is in its early stages. Consistent use and a shared definition of the term 'JITAI' will aid evidence synthesis. We recommend robust evaluation of theory and evidence-based JITAIs in representative populations. Decision makers and health professionals need to be cautious in signposting patients to JITAIs until such evidence is available, although they are unlikely to cause health-related harm.

Reference: PROSPERO 2017 CRD42017070849.

Download full-text PDF

Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0792-7DOI Listing
April 2019
21 Reads

Article Mentions

Provided by Crossref Event Data
Datacite: Datacite
April 4, 2019, 12:41 am EST

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physical activity
sedentary behaviour
interventions jitais
feasibility acceptability
adaptive interventions
just-in-time adaptive
systematic review
shared definition
data extraction
reliability timeliness
extraction independently
paper screening
uptake feasibility
engagement uptake
timeliness just-in-time

Altmetric Statistics


(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Public Health Rep
CJ Caspersen et al.
Public Health Rep 1985
Article in Ann Behav Med
A Direito et al.
Ann Behav Med 2017
Article in Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
A Stephenson et al.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017
Article in J Rehabil Med
S Hakala et al.
J Rehabil Med 2017
Article in Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
AM Muller et al.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2016
Article in Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
A Middelweerd et al.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014

S Nahum-Shani et al.
Article in Nicotine Tob Res
F Naughton et al.
Nicotine Tob Res 2016
Article in Prev Med
P Krebs et al.
Prev Med 2010
Article in Ann Behav Med
M Karmeniemi et al.
Ann Behav Med 2018
Article in J Med Internet Res
SM Schembre et al.
J Med Internet Res 2018

Similar Publications