Not all perceptual difficulties lower memory predictions: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with rotated and inverted object images.

Authors:
Miri Besken
Miri Besken
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
United States

Mem Cognit 2019 Feb 21. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Department of Psychology, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.

Studies typically show that perceptual difficulties at the time of encoding lower memory predictions. One potential exception to this is the inverted-word manipulation, in which participants produce equivalent memory predictions for upright and inverted words, despite higher free-recall performance for the inverted words (Sungkhasettee, Friedman, & Castel in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 973-978, 2011). In the present set of experiments, we aimed to investigate the contributions of online perceptual difficulties versus a priori beliefs through two disfluency manipulations conceptually similar to the inverted-word manipulation: inversion and canonicity. The inversion manipulation involved presentation of upright and inverted object images, whereas the canonicity manipulation involved presentation of objects to participants from frequent (canonical) or infrequent (noncanonical) viewing perspectives. Memory predictions were made either on an item-by-item basis or aggregately. In all studies, the perceptual identification latencies for inverted and noncanonical items were slower than those for upright and canonical items, respectively. In experiments conducted with item-by-item memory predictions, predictions were not significantly different from each other across encoding conditions. In contrast, in experiments using aggregate memory predictions, fluent items produced higher memory predictions than did disfluent items. These results show that in certain cases, participants may not consider online objective perceptual difficulties. Moreover, item-by-item and aggregate memory predictions produce different patterns, evidence of a dissociation between the two types of predictions. The results are discussed in light of theories that rely on objective perceptual fluency differences across encoding conditions versus theories that rely on participants' a priori beliefs about fluency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00907-7DOI Listing
February 2019
1 Read

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

memory predictions
32
perceptual difficulties
16
predictions
10
inverted object
8
involved presentation
8
theories rely
8
priori beliefs
8
object images
8
objective perceptual
8
inverted-word manipulation
8
aggregate memory
8
perceptual fluency
8
manipulation involved
8
lower memory
8
upright inverted
8
memory
8
encoding conditions
8
perceptual
7
inverted
5
canonical items
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Memory & Cognition
I Begg et al.
Memory & Cognition 1991
Article in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
M Besken et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2016
Article in Memory & Cognition
M Besken et al.
Memory & Cognition 2013
Article in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
M Besken et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2014

RA Bjork et al.
1994
Article in PLoS ONE
MB Brodeur et al.
PLoS ONE 2010
Article in Cognitive Psychology
LA Cooper et al.
Cognitive Psychology 1975
Article in Psychology and Aging
J Dunlosky et al.
Psychology and Aging 2000

J Dunlosky et al.
2015
Article in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
DJ Frank et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2017
Article in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
P Gomez et al.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008

Similar Publications