Practical approaches to automated digital image analysis of Ki-67 labeling index in 997 breast carcinomas and causes of discordance with visual assessment.

PLoS One 2019 20;14(2):e0212309. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

The Ki-67 labeling index (LI) is an important prognostic factor in breast carcinoma. The Ki-67 LI is traditionally calculated via unaided microscopic estimation; however, inter-observer and intra-observer variability and low reproducibility are problems with this visual assessment (VA) method. For more accurate assessment and better reproducibility with Ki-67 LI, digital image analysis was introduced recently. We used both VA and automated digital image analysis (ADIA) (Ventana Virtuoso image management software) to estimate Ki-67 LI for 997 cases of breast carcinoma, and compared VA and ADIA results. VA and ADIA were highly correlated (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.982, and Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.966, p<0.05). We retrospectively analyzed cases with a greater than 5% difference between VA and ADIA results. The cause of these differences was: (1) tumor heterogeneity (98 cases, 56.0%), (2) VA interpretation error (32 cases, 18.3%), (3) misidentification of tumor cells (26 cases, 14.9%), (4) poor immunostaining or slide quality (16 cases, 9.1%), and (5) Estimation of non-tumor cells (3 cases, 1.7%). There were more discrepancies between VA and ADIA results in the group with a VA value of 10-20% compared to groups with <10% and ≥20%. Although ADIA is more accurate than VA, there are some limitations. Therefore, ADIA findings require confirmation by a pathologist.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212309PLOS
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6382355PMC
February 2019
20 Reads
3.234 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image analysis
12
digital image
12
ki-67 labeling
8
visual assessment
8
automated digital
8
correlation coefficient
8
breast carcinoma
8
ki-67
5
reproducibility ki-67
4
ki-67 digital
4
analysis introduced
4
introduced automated
4
adia ventana
4
analysis adia
4
better reproducibility
4
ventana virtuoso
4
method accurate
4
variability low
4
intra-observer variability
4
inter-observer intra-observer
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009
A Goldhirsch et al.
Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 2009
Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential
R Yerushalmi et al.
The Lancet Oncology 2010
St. Gallen 2011: Summary of the Consensus Discussion
M Gnant et al.
Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) 2011
Ki-67 evaluation in breast cancer: The daily diagnostic practice
L Fulawka et al.
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 2017
A novel model for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer
Q Romero et al.
Diagnostic pathology 2014

Similar Publications