A participatory epidemiological study of major cattle diseases amongst Maasai pastoralists living in wildlife-livestock interfaces in Maasai Mara, Kenya.

Authors:
Silvia Alonso
Silvia Alonso
Royal Veterinary College
United Kingdom
David Odongo
David Odongo
International Livestock Research Institute
Eucharia Kenya
Eucharia Kenya
Kenyatta University
Bernard Bett
Bernard Bett
Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine
United States

Trop Anim Health Prod 2019 Jun 25;51(5):1097-1103. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

International Livestock Research Institute, (ILRI), P. O BOX 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.

Livestock-wildlife interactions promote the transmission of a wide range of infectious diseases that constraint livestock production. We used a participatory appraisal approach to find out and rank infectious diseases of concern to pastoralists in a zone of intense wildlife-livestock interaction and another zone with limited interactions. Four villages were selected purposively in areas with intensive cattle-wildlife interactions (zone 1), and another two in areas with low to moderate cattle-wildlife interactions (zone 2). Data were collected in focus group discussions (FGDs) using participatory epidemiological methods (PE); each group had 8-13 participants. Results of impact matrix scoring from all sites indicated that malignant catarrhal fever (MCF), anthrax, foot and mouth disease (FMD), contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP), east coast fever (ECF) and African animal trypanosomiasis (ATT), in decreasing order, had the highest impact on livestock production. A Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant difference in FMD annual prevalence between cattle age groups (p < 0.001) and was the highest in animals > 4 years (median score of 32.5, range, 10-50). FMD had the highest impact on milk production, but based on veterinary costs (treatment costs), it was ranked second to CBPP. The study provides information on disease priorities that occur in the target zones in Mara ecosystem and which the local pastoralists must consider when accessing key ecosystem services such as water and pasture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-01790-1DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520318PMC

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
June 2019
5 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

livestock production
8
interactions zone
8
highest impact
8
infectious diseases
8
cattle-wildlife interactions
8
participatory epidemiological
8
group 8-13
4
p  4 years median
4
ranked second
4
8-13 participants
4
methods group
4
cbpp study
4
second cbpp
4
epidemiological methods
4
participants impact
4
costs ranked
4
scoring sites
4
costs treatment
4
sites indicated
4
treatment costs
4

Similar Publications