"Do You Know What I Know?": How Communication Norms and Recipient Design Shape the Content and Effectiveness of Patient Handoffs.

Authors:
Dr Paul Barach, BSc, MD, MPH
Dr Paul Barach, BSc, MD, MPH
Wayne State University School of Medicine
Clinical Professor
Anesthesia, critical care
Chicago, IL | United States

J Gen Intern Med 2019 Feb 10;34(2):264-271. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, USA.

Background: Poor communication during end-of-shift transfers of care (handoffs) is associated with safety risks and patient harm. Despite the common perception that handoffs are largely a one-way transfer of information, researchers have documented that they are complex interactions, guided by implicit social norms and mental frameworks.

Objectives: We investigated communication strategies that resident physicians report deploying to tailor information during face-to-face handoffs that are often based on their implicit inferences about the perceived information needs and potential harm to patients.

Methods/participants: We interviewed 35 residents in Medicine and Surgery wards at three VA Medical Centers (VAMCs).

Main Measures: We conducted qualitative interviews using audio-recorded semi-structured cognitive task interviews.

Key Results: The effectiveness of handoff communication depends upon three factors: receiver characteristics, type of shift, and patient's condition and perceived acuity. Receiver characteristics, including subjective perceptions about an incoming resident's training or ability levels and their assumed preferences for information (e.g., detailed/comprehensive vs. minimal/"big picture"), influenced content shared during handoffs. Residents handing off to the night team provided more information about patients' medical histories and care plans than residents handing off to the day team, and higher patient acuity merited more detailed information and the medical service(s) involved dictated the types of information conveyed.

Conclusions: We found that handoff communication involves a complex combination of socio-technical information where residents balance relational factors against content and risk. It is not a mechanistic process of merely transferring clinical data but rather is based on learned habits of communication that are context-sensitive and variable, what we refer to as "recipient design." Interventions should focus on raising awareness of times when information is omitted, customized, or expanded based on implicit judgments, the emerging threats such judgments pose to patient care and quality, and the competencies needed to be more explicit in handoff interactions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11606-018-4755-5
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4755-5DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374251PMC
February 2019
27 Reads
3.449 Impact Factor

Article Mentions


Provided by Crossref Event Data
twitter
Twitter: Medpedshosp
January 3, 2019, 5:03 pm EST
twitter
Twitter: Regenstrief
January 3, 2019, 4:53 pm EST
twitter
Twitter: JournalGIM
January 3, 2019, 4:34 pm EST
twitter
Twitter: Nickrattray
December 17, 2018, 2:22 pm EST
twitter
Twitter: Vahsrd
December 14, 2018, 5:00 pm EST
twitter
Twitter: JournalGIM
December 13, 2018, 4:44 pm EST
twitter
Twitter: Alisonh3
December 13, 2018, 10:26 am EST
twitter
Twitter: Nickrattray
December 13, 2018, 10:20 am EST
twitter
Twitter: JournalGIM
December 10, 2018, 7:50 pm EST

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

receiver characteristics
8
residents handing
8
handoff communication
8
based implicit
8
communication
6
handoffs
5
based learned
4
characteristics type
4
depends three
4
learned habits
4
communication depends
4
type shift
4
three factors
4
factors receiver
4
data based
4
including subjective
4
characteristics including
4
transferring clinical
4
subjective perceptions
4
perceptions incoming
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Jt Comm J Qual Saf
BT Kitch et al.
Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2008
Article in Arch Intern Med
LI Horwitz et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008
Article in J Hosp Med
VM Arora et al.
J Hosp Med 2009
Article in Acad Med
LA Riesenberg et al.
Acad Med 2009
Article in JAMA
S Kripalani et al.
JAMA 2007
Article in Ann Intern Med
G Hesselink et al.
Ann Intern Med 2012
Article in Med Care
G Hesselink et al.
Med Care 2013
Article in Qual Saf Health Care
MD Cohen et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2010
Article in Jt Comm J Qual Saf
B Hilligoss et al.
Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2015
Article in BMJ Qual Saf
G Toccafondi et al.
BMJ Qual Saf 2012
Article in Advances in Health Care Management
B Hilligoss et al.
Advances in Health Care Management 2011

Similar Publications