Adapting the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument for Lower Socioeconomic Status: Improving Readability, Acceptability, and Relevance.

MDM Policy Pract 2018 Jul-Dec;3(2):2381468318811839. Epub 2018 Nov 25.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Breast cancer is the second most common malignancy in women. The Decision Quality Instrument (DQI) measures the extent to which patients are informed and involved in breast surgery decisions and receive treatment that aligns with their preferences. There are limited data on the performance of the DQI in women of lower socioeconomic status (SES). Our aims were to 1) examine (and if necessary adapt) the readability, usability, and acceptability of the DQI and 2) explore whether it captures factors important to breast cancer surgery decisions among women of lower SES (relevance). We conducted semistructured cognitive interviews with women of lower SES (based on insurance status, income, and education) who had completed early-stage breast cancer treatments at three cancer centers. We used a two-step thematic analysis with dual independent coding. The study team (including Patient Partners and a Community Advisory Board) reviewed and refined suggested changes. The revised DQI was presented in two focus groups of breast cancer survivors. We conducted 39 interviews. Participants found most parts of the DQI to be helpful and easy to understand. We made the following suggested changes: 1) added a glossary of key terms, 2) added two answer choices and an open text question in the goals and concerns subscale, 3) reworded the treatment intention question, and 4) revised the knowledge subscale instructions since several women disliked the wording and were unsure of what was expected. The readability, usability, acceptability, and relevance of a measure that was primarily developed and validated in women of higher SES required adaptation for optimal use by women of lower SES. Further research will test these adaptations in lower SES populations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468318811839DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262751PMC
November 2018
38 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
20
lower ses
16
women lower
16
decision quality
8
readability usability
8
quality instrument
8
lower socioeconomic
8
acceptability relevance
8
usability acceptability
8
suggested changes
8
socioeconomic status
8
cancer surgery
8
surgery decisions
8
women
7
ses
6
lower
6
cancer
6
dqi
5
breast
5
thematic analysis
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

Donepudi MS et al.
J Cancer Res Therap 2014

Wheeler SB et al.
Oncologist 2013

Hurd TC et al.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2005

Chen JY et al.
Cancer 2008

Hawley ST et al.
Patient Educ Couns 2007

MacBride MB et al.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013

McVea KL et al.
Psychooncology 2001

Polacek GN et al.
Patient Educ Couns 2007

Richardson LC. et al.
Breast J 2004

Siminoff LA et al.
Patient Educ Couns 2006

Albano JD et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007

Similar Publications