New and Important Changes in the TNM Staging System for Breast Cancer.

Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018 May;38:457-467

From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Departments of Surgical Oncology and Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA.

Expanded understanding of biologic factors that modulate the clinical course of malignant disease have led to the gradual integration of biomarkers into staging classifications. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system is universally used and has largely displaced other staging classifications for most, although not all, cancers. Many of the chapters of the eighth edition of the AJCC TNM staging system integrated biomarkers with anatomic definitions. The Breast Chapter added estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression, HER2 expression, and/or amplification and histologic grade to the anatomic assessment of tumor size, regional lymph node involvement, and distant metastases (known as TNM). While preserving an anatomic staging system for continuity and for regions where modern biomarkers are not always available, the eighth edition emphasizes the increased prognostic precision of the clinical prognostic stage groups and the pathologic prognostic stage groups. The clinical prognostic stage groups are applicable to all patients with primary breast cancer before any treatment has been implemented, but require a clinical and imaging evaluation as well as a biopsy with grade and available ER, PR, and HER2 results; the pathologic prognostic stage groups are applicable to all patients treated with complete surgical excision as first treatment and also require a complete pathology report, grade, and ER, PR, and HER2. Applying the pathologic prognostic stage groups to a large database of patients staged by basic TNM groupings changed the stage grouping of almost 40% of patients. Grouping by pathologic prognostic stage groups led to a better prognostic distribution of the group and more precise individual prognostication.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_201313DOI Listing
May 2018
2 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prognostic stage
24
stage groups
24
pathologic prognostic
16
staging system
16
tnm staging
12
ajcc tnm
8
prognostic
8
clinical prognostic
8
staging classifications
8
breast cancer
8
grade her2
8
groups applicable
8
applicable patients
8
eighth edition
8
stage
7
groups
6
staging
6
involvement distant
4
distant metastases
4
tnm preserving
4

Similar Publications