Nutritional quality of food as represented by the FSAm-NPS nutrient profiling system underlying the Nutri-Score label and cancer risk in Europe: Results from the EPIC prospective cohort study.

PLoS Med 2018 09 18;15(9):e1002651. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Sorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Centre (CRESS), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, COMUE Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris 13 University, Bobigny, France.

Background: Helping consumers make healthier food choices is a key issue for the prevention of cancer and other diseases. In many countries, political authorities are considering the implementation of a simplified labelling system to reflect the nutritional quality of food products. The Nutri-Score, a five-colour nutrition label, is derived from the Nutrient Profiling System of the British Food Standards Agency (modified version) (FSAm-NPS). How the consumption of foods with high/low FSAm-NPS relates to cancer risk has been studied in national/regional cohorts but has not been characterized in diverse European populations.

Methods And Findings: This prospective analysis included 471,495 adults from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC, 1992-2014, median follow-up: 15.3 y), among whom there were 49,794 incident cancer cases (main locations: breast, n = 12,063; prostate, n = 6,745; colon-rectum, n = 5,806). Usual food intakes were assessed with standardized country-specific diet assessment methods. The FSAm-NPS was calculated for each food/beverage using their 100-g content in energy, sugar, saturated fatty acid, sodium, fibres, proteins, and fruits/vegetables/legumes/nuts. The FSAm-NPS scores of all food items usually consumed by a participant were averaged to obtain the individual FSAm-NPS Dietary Index (DI) scores. Multi-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were computed. A higher FSAm-NPS DI score, reflecting a lower nutritional quality of the food consumed, was associated with a higher risk of total cancer (HRQ5 versus Q1 = 1.07; 95% CI 1.03-1.10, P-trend < 0.001). Absolute cancer rates in those with high and low (quintiles 5 and 1) FSAm-NPS DI scores were 81.4 and 69.5 cases/10,000 person-years, respectively. Higher FSAm-NPS DI scores were specifically associated with higher risks of cancers of the colon-rectum, upper aerodigestive tract and stomach, lung for men, and liver and postmenopausal breast for women (all P < 0.05). The main study limitation is that it was based on an observational cohort using self-reported dietary data obtained through a single baseline food frequency questionnaire; thus, exposure misclassification and residual confounding cannot be ruled out.

Conclusions: In this large multinational European cohort, the consumption of food products with a higher FSAm-NPS score (lower nutritional quality) was associated with a higher risk of cancer. This supports the relevance of the FSAm-NPS as underlying nutrient profiling system for front-of-pack nutrition labels, as well as for other public health nutritional measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002651DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143197PMC
September 2018
42 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nutritional quality
16
higher fsam-nps
12
nutrient profiling
12
fsam-nps scores
12
quality food
12
profiling system
12
associated higher
12
fsam-nps
11
food
9
cancer risk
8
cancer
8
food products
8
fsam-nps score
8
lower nutritional
8
higher risk
8
higher
6
nutritional
5
fsam-nps calculated
4
methods fsam-nps
4
limitation based
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Cancer preventability estimates for food, nutrition, body fatness, and physical activity
2017
Moving forward in public health nutrition—the I World Congress of Public Health Nutrition
L Serra-Majem et al.
Introduction. Nutr Rev 2009
Propositions pour un nouvel élan de la politique nutritionnelle française de santé publique dans le cadre de la stratégie nationale de santé
S Hercberg et al.
1ère partie: mesures concernant la prévention nutritionnelle 2013
The science on front-of-package food labels
KL Hawley et al.
Public Health Nutr 2013
Validating a nutrient profile model
C Arambepola et al.
Public Health Nutr 2008
Final Report
M Rayner et al.
2005
The UK Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model: Defining 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' foods and drinks for TV advertising to children
M Rayner et al.
2009
Evaluation de la faisabilité du calcul d'un score nutritionnel tel qu'élaboré par Rayner et al. Rapport d'appui scientifique et technique
2015

Similar Publications