Meta-analysis of transcriptomic responses to biotic and abiotic stress in tomato.

PeerJ 2018 17;6:e4631. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

A wide range of biotic stresses (BS) and abiotic stresses (AS) adversely affect plant growth and productivity worldwide. The study of individual genes cannot be considered as an effective approach for the understanding of tolerance mechanisms, since these stresses are frequent and often in combination with each other, and a large number of genes are involved in these mechanisms. The availability of high-throughput genomic data has enabled the discovery of the role of transcription factors (TFs) in regulatory networks. A meta-analysis of BS and AS responses was performed by analyzing a total of 391 microarray samples from 23 different experiments and 2,336 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in multiple stresses were identified. We identified 1,862 genes differentially regulated in response to BS was much greater than that regulated by AS, 835 genes, and found 15.4% or 361 DEGs with the conserved expression between AS and BS. The greatest percent of genes related to the cellular process (>76% genes), metabolic process (>76% genes) and response to stimulus (>50%). About 4.2% of genes involved in BS and AS responses belonged to the TF families. We identified several genes, which encode TFs that play an important role in AS and BS responses. These proteins included Jasmonate Ethylene Response Factor 1 (JERF1), SlGRAS6, MYB48, SlERF4, EIL2, protein LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), SlERF1, WRKY 26, basic leucine zipper TF, inducer of CBF expression 1-like, pti6, EIL3 and WRKY 11. Six of these proteins, JERF1, MYB48, protein LHY, EIL3, EIL2 and SlGRAS6, play central roles in these mechanisms. This research promoted a new approach to clarify the expression profiles of various genes under different conditions in plants, detected common genes from differentially regulated in response to these conditions and introduced them as candidate genes for improving plant tolerance through genetic engineering approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4631DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6054068PMC
July 2018

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

genes
13
process >76%
8
genes involved
8
differentially regulated
8
genes differentially
8
regulated response
8
>76% genes
8
regulated 835
4
835 genes
4
lhy eil3
4
genes 154%
4
eil3 eil2
4
greater regulated
4
response
4
basic leucine
4
eil2 slgras6
4
response greater
4
hypocotyl lhy
4
protein lhy
4
expression greatest
4

Similar Publications

The Role of Tomato Genes in Plant Responses to Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses.

Front Plant Sci 2018 13;9:801. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

Plant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

In the field, plants constantly face a plethora of abiotic and biotic stresses that can impart detrimental effects on plants. In response to multiple stresses, plants can rapidly reprogram their transcriptome through a tightly regulated and highly dynamic regulatory network where WRKY transcription factors can act as activators or repressors. WRKY transcription factors have diverse biological functions in plants, but most notably are key players in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
June 2018

Analyses of Catharanthus roseus and Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY transcription factors reveal involvement in jasmonate signaling.

BMC Genomics 2014 Jun 20;15:502. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA.

Background: To combat infection to biotic stress plants elicit the biosynthesis of numerous natural products, many of which are valuable pharmaceutical compounds. Jasmonate is a central regulator of defense response to pathogens and accumulation of specialized metabolites. Catharanthus roseus produces a large number of terpenoid indole alkaloids (TIAs) and is an excellent model for understanding the regulation of this class of valuable compounds. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
June 2014

Microarray analysis of transcriptional responses to salt and drought stress in .

Heliyon 2019 Nov 29;5(11):e02614. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Microarray expression profile analysis is a useful approach to increase our knowledge about genes involved in regulatory networks and signal transduction pathways related to abiotic stress tolerance. Salt and drought, as two important abiotic stresses, adversely affect plant productivity in the world every year. To understand stress response mechanisms and identify genes and proteins which play critical roles in these mechanisms, the study of individual genes and proteins cannot be considered as an effective approach. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
November 2019

Transcription Factors Associated with Abiotic and Biotic Stress Tolerance and Their Potential for Crops Improvement.

Genes (Basel) 2019 09 30;10(10). Epub 2019 Sep 30.

Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Hebei Laboratory of Agricultural Water Saving, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050021, China.

In field conditions, crops are adversely affected by a wide range of abiotic stresses including drought, cold, salt, and heat, as well as biotic stresses including pests and pathogens. These stresses can have a marked effect on crop yield. The present and future effects of climate change necessitate the improvement of crop stress tolerance. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
September 2019