Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in Observational Studies of Treatment Effect.

    Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2018 May;44(2):203-213
    Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada.
    A challenge to the use of observational data to study treatment effects is the issue of confounding. Noncomparability of exposed and nonexposed subjects can lead to biased estimation of the treatment effect. The propensity score is a balancing score that can be used to form matched groups, or pairs, that are not systematically different and enable nonbiased comparisons between groups. This article reviews propensity score methods with an illustrative example of the application of propensity score matching in an observational study of an uncommon disease (systemic sclerosis).
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with PubFacts.com)
    Source Status
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2018.01.002DOI ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Stat Med 2007 Feb;26(4):734-53
    Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
    The propensity score--the probability of exposure to a specific treatment conditional on observed variables--is increasingly being used in observational studies. Creating strata in which subjects are matched on the propensity score allows one to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects. There is an ongoing controversy in the literature as to which variables to include in the propensity score model. Read More
    Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.
    Nurs Res 2008 Nov-Dec;57(6):444-52
    Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
    Background: Lack of randomization of nursing intervention in outcome effectiveness studies may lead to imbalanced covariates. Consequently, estimation of nursing intervention effect can be biased as in other observational studies. Propensity score analysis is an effective statistical method to reduce such bias and further derive causal effects in observational studies. Read More
    Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Int J Biostat 2009 Apr 14;5(1):Article 13. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
    Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Canada.
    Propensity-score matching is frequently used in the medical literature to reduce or eliminate the effect of treatment selection bias when estimating the effect of treatments or exposures on outcomes using observational data. In propensity-score matching, pairs of treated and untreated subjects with similar propensity scores are formed. Recent systematic reviews of the use of propensity-score matching found that the large majority of researchers ignore the matched nature of the propensity-score matched sample when estimating the statistical significance of the treatment effect. Read More
    Selecting an appropriate caliper can be essential for achieving good balance with propensity score matching.
    Am J Epidemiol 2014 Jan 10;179(2):226-35. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
    Matching on the propensity score is widely used to estimate the effect of an exposure in observational studies. However, the quality of the matches can be affected by decisions made during the matching process, particularly the order in which subjects are selected for matching and the maximum permitted difference between matched subjects (the "caliper"). This study used simulations to explore the effects of these decisions on both the imbalance of covariates and the closeness of matching, while allowing the numbers of potential matches and strengths of association between the confounding variable and the exposure to vary. Read More