Health professional perceptions regarding screening tools for developmental surveillance for children in a multicultural part of Sydney, Australia.

BMC Fam Pract 2018 04 2;19(1):42. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Background: Encouraging early child development and the early identification of developmental difficulties is a priority. The Ministry of Health in the Australian State of New South Wales (NSW), has recommended a program of developmental surveillance using validated screening questionnaires, namely, the Parents' Evaluation of Development Status (PEDS) and Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQs), however, the use of these tools has remained sub-optimal. A longitudinal prospective birth cohort "Watch Me grow" study was carried out in the South Western Sydney (SW) region of NSW to ascertain the uptake as well as the strategies and the resources required to maximise engagement in the surveillance program. This paper reports on a qualitative component of the study examining the attitudes, enablers and barriers to the current developmental surveillance practices, with reference to screening tools, amongst health professionals.

Methods: Qualitative data from 37 primary health care providers in a region of relative disadvantage in Sydney was analysed.

Results: The major themes that emerged from the data were the "difficulties/problems" and "positives/benefits" of surveillance in general, and "specificity" of the tools which were employed. Barriers of time, tool awareness, knowledge and access of referral pathways, and services were important for the physician providers, while the choice of screening tools and access to these tools in other languages were raised as important issues by Child and Family Health Nurses (CFHN). The use of these tools by health professionals was also influenced by what the professionals perceived as the parents' understanding of their child's development. While the PEDS and ASQs was utilised by CFHNs, both General Practitioners (GPs) and paediatricians commented that they lacked awareness of developmental screening tools and highlighted further training needs.

Conclusions: The results highlight the practical challenges to, and limited knowledge and uptake of, the use of recommended screening tools as part of developmental surveillance. There is a need for further research regarding the most effective integrated models of care which will allow for a better collaboration between parents and service providers and improve information sharing between different professionals such as CFHNs GPs, Practices nurses and Paediatricians involved in screening and surveillance programs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0728-3DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879732PMC
April 2018
14 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening tools
20
developmental surveillance
16
tools
9
tools health
8
tools developmental
8
surveillance
7
screening
7
health
6
developmental
6
time tool
4
barriers time
4
awareness knowledge
4
data "difficulties/problems"
4
employed barriers
4
tool awareness
4
"specificity" tools
4
knowledge access
4
"positives/benefits" surveillance
4
"difficulties/problems" "positives/benefits"
4
general "specificity"
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

D Deming et al.
Am Econ J Appl Econ 2009

M Blair et al.
Arch Dis Child 2006

M Blair et al.
Paediatr Child Health 2014

S Woolfenden et al.
BMC Pediatr 2014

S Goldfeld et al.
J Dev Behav Pediatr 2012

M Wake et al.
Soc Policy Res Pap. 2008

MT Greenberg et al.
Dev Psychol 1999

M Janus et al.
Early Educ Dev 2007

JF Hagan et al.
2008

Similar Publications