Multiple mini interview (MMI) for general practice training selection in Australia: interviewers' motivation.

Authors:
Annette Burgess
Annette Burgess
The University of Sydney
Australia
Chris Roberts
Chris Roberts
University of Manchester
United Kingdom
Premala Sureshkumar
Premala Sureshkumar
The Children's Hospital at Westmead
Australia

BMC Med Educ 2018 Jan 25;18(1):21. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

Sydney Medical School - Northern, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Background: Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) are being used by a growing number of postgraduate training programs and medical schools as their interview process for selection entry. The Australian General Practice and Training (AGPT) used a National Assessment Centre (NAC) approach to selection into General Practice (GP) Training, which include MMIs. Interviewing is a resource intensive process, and implementation of the MMI requires a large number of interviewers, with a number of candidates being interviewed simultaneously. In 2015, 308 interviewers participated in the MMI process - a decrease from 340 interviewers in 2014, and 310 in 2013. At the same time, the number of applicants has steadily increased, with 1930 applications received in 2013; 2254 in 2014; and 2360 in 2015. This has raised concerns regarding the increasing recruitment needs, and the need to retain interviewers for subsequent years of MMIs. In order to investigate interviewers' reasons for participating in MMIs, we utilised self-determination theory (SDT) to consider interviewers' motivation to take part in MMIs at national selection centres.

Methods: In 2015, 308 interviewers were recruited from 17 Regional Training Providers (RTPs) to participate in the MMI process at one of 15 NACs. For this study, a convenience sample of NAC sites was used. Forty interviewers were interviewed (nā€‰=ā€‰40; 40/308ā€‰=ā€‰13%) from five NACs. Framework analysis was used to code and categorise data into themes.

Results: Interviewers' motivation to take part as interviewers were largely related to their sense of duty, their desire to contribute their expertise to the process, and their desire to have input into selection of GP Registrars; a sense of duty to their profession; and an opportunity to meet with colleagues and future trainees. Interviewers also highlighted factors hindering motivation, which sometimes included the large number of candidates seen in one day.

Conclusion: Interviewers' motivation for contributing to the MMIs was largely related to their desire to contribute to their profession, and ultimately improve future patient care. Interviewers recognised the importance of interviewing, and felt their individual roles made a crucial contribution to the profession of general practice. Good administration and leadership at each NAC is needed. By gaining an understanding of interviewers' motivation, and enhancing this, engagement and retention of interviewers may be increased.
PDF Download - Full Text Link
( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with PubFacts.com)
Source Status
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1128-zDOI ListingPossible
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5785877PMCFound
January 2018
2 Reads

Similar Publications

The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training.

BMC Med Educ 2014 Aug 13;14:169. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Background: Entry into specialty training was determined by a National Assessment Centre (NAC) approach using a combination of a behavioural Multiple-Mini-Interview (MMI) and a written Situational Judgement Test (SJT). We wanted to know if interviewers could make reliable and valid decisions about the non-cognitive characteristics of candidates with the purpose of selecting them into general practice specialty training using the MMI. Second, we explored the concurrent validity of the MMI with the SJT. Read More

View Article
August 2014

Candidates' and interviewers' perceptions of multiple-mini interviews for admission to an occupational therapy professional program.

Occup Ther Health Care 2015 Apr 30;29(2):186-200. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

1School of Physical and Occupational Therapy and Centre for Medical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Multiple-Mini Interviews (MMIs) were used to assess professional attributes of candidates seeking admission to an occupational therapy professional entry-level master's program. Candidates and interviewers were invited to complete a questionnaire comprised of quantitative and open-ended questions following the MMIs. The MMIs were perceived to be fair, enjoyable, and capable of capturing professional attributes. Read More

View Article
April 2015

The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia.

BMC Med Educ 2016 Mar 9;16:87. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

Work Psychology Group, 27 Brunel Parkway, Pride Park, Derby, DE24 8HR, UK.

Background: Evidence for the predictive validity of situational judgement tests (SJTs) and multiple-mini interviews (MMIs) is well-established in undergraduate selection contexts, however at present there is less evidence to support the validity of their use in postgraduate settings. More research is also required to assess the extent to which SJTs and MMIs are complementary for predicting performance in practice. This study represents the first longitudinal evaluation of the complementary roles and predictive validity of an SJT and an MMI for selection for entry into postgraduate General Practice (GP) specialty training in Australia. Read More

View Article
March 2016

Multiple mini-interviews: opinions of candidates and interviewers.

Med Educ 2008 Feb;42(2):207-13

Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Walsgrave, Coventry, UK.

Objectives: To assess candidates' and interviewers' perceptions of the use of a multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection of senior house officers (SHOs) to a UK regional paediatric training programme.

Methods: Both candidates and interviewers completed anonymous questionnaires (comprising 16 and 25 questions, respectively). Demographic data were recorded for both groups. Read More

View Article
February 2008