Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    The GP tests of competence assessment: which part best predicts fitness to practise decisions?

    BMC Med Educ 2018 Jan 2;18(1). Epub 2018 Jan 2.
    Research Department of Medical Education, University College London, London, UK.
    Background: The General Medical Council (GMC) conducts Tests of Competence (ToC) for doctors referred for Fitness to Practise (FtP) issues. GPs take a single best answer knowledge test, an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), and a Simulated Surgery (SimSurg) assessment which is a simulated GP consultation. The aim of this study was to examine the similarities between OSCEs and SimSurg to determine whether each assessment contributed something unique to GP ToCs.

    Methods: A mixed methods approach was used. Data were collated on 153 GPs who were required to undertake a ToC as a part of being investigated for FtP issues between February 2010 and October 2016. Using correlation analysis, we examined to what degree performance on the knowledge test, OSCE, and SimSurg related to case examiner recommendations and FtP outcomes, including the unique predictive power of these three assessments. The outcome measures were case examiner recommendations (i) not fit to practise; ii) fit to practise on a limited basis; or iii) fit to practise) as well as FtP outcomes (i) erased/removed from the register; ii) having restrictions/conditions; or iii) be in good standing). For the qualitative component, 45 GP assessors were asked to rate whether they assess the same competencies and which assessment provides better feedback about candidates.

    Results: There was significant overlap between OSCEs and SimSurg, p < 0.001. SimSurg had additional predictive power in the presence of OSCEs and the knowledge test (p = 0.030) in distinguishing doctors from different FtP categories, while OSCEs did not (p = 0.080). Both the OSCEs (p = 0.004) and SimSurg (p < 0.001) had significant negative correlations with case examiner recommendations when accounting for the effects of the other two assessments. Inductive thematic analysis of the responses to the questionnaire showed that assessors perceived OSCEs to be better suited to target specific knowledge and skills. SimSurg was thought to produce a more global picture as the scenarios more accurately portray a patient consultation.

    Conclusion: While all three assessments are strong predictors of both case examiner recommendations and FtP outcomes, our findings suggest that the efficiency of GP ToCs can be improved by removing some of this overlapping content.
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with
    Source Status ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    Are the General Medical Council's Tests of Competence fair to long standing doctors? A retrospective cohort study.
    BMC Med Educ 2015 Apr 21;15:80. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
    Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
    Background: The General Medical Council's Fitness to Practise investigations may involve a test of competence for doctors with performance concerns. Concern has been raised about the suitability of the test format for doctors who qualified before the introduction of Single Best Answer and Objective Structured Clinical Examination assessments, both of which form the test of competence. This study explored whether the examination formats used in the tests of competence are fair to long standing doctors who have undergone fitness to practise investigation. Read More
    The value of best-practice guidelines for OSCEs in a postgraduate program in an Australian remote area setting.
    Rural Remote Health 2014 27;14(3):2469. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
    University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
    Introduction: Nurses in remote areas of Australia are the primary healthcare professionals, who need to be able to deliver comprehensive and culturally sensitive care to clients, many of whom are Indigenous Australians. Adequate and specific preparation for practice is crucial to the quality of care delivered by remote area nurses (RANs). Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) provide an excellent opportunity for student practice in a simulated environment that is safe, authentic, fair and valid when well constructed. Read More
    Evaluation of outcomes of a formative objective structured clinical examination for second-year UK medical students.
    Int J Med Educ 2015 Jun 21;6:76-83. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
    GKT School of Medical Education, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London,UK.
    Objective: To explore how formative OSCEs influence student performance and perception when undertaking summative OSCEs.

    Methods: We introduced formative OSCEs for second-year medical students at a large London medical school. Examination data from both formative and subsequent summative OSCEs were analysed to determine the effect on summative OSCE performance. Read More
    Traditional finals and OSCEs in predicting consultant and self-reported clinical skills of PRHOs: a pilot study.
    Med Educ 2003 Jul;37(7):597-602
    Division of Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
    Introduction: As we move from standard 'long case' final examinations to new objective structured formats, we need to ensure the new is at least as good as the old. Furthermore, knowledge of which examination format best predicts medical student progression and clinical skills development would be of value.

    Methods: A group of medical students sat both the standard long case examination and the new objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to introduce this latter examination to our Medical School for final MB. Read More