Representing, Running, and Revising Mental Models: A Computational Model.

Cogn Sci 2018 05 27;42(4):1110-1145. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University.

People use commonsense science knowledge to flexibly explain, predict, and manipulate the world around them, yet we lack computational models of how this commonsense science knowledge is represented, acquired, utilized, and revised. This is an important challenge for cognitive science: Building higher order computational models in this area will help characterize one of the hallmarks of human reasoning, and it will allow us to build more robust reasoning systems. This paper presents a novel assembled coherence (AC) theory of human conceptual change, whereby people revise beliefs and mental models by constructing and evaluating explanations using fragmentary, globally inconsistent knowledge. We implement AC theory with Timber, a computational model of conceptual change that revises its beliefs and generates human-like explanations in commonsense science. Timber represents domain knowledge using predicate calculus and qualitative model fragments, and uses an abductive model formulation algorithm to construct competing explanations for phenomena. Timber then (a) scores competing explanations with respect to previously accepted beliefs, using a cost function based on simplicity and credibility, (b) identifies a low-cost, preferred explanation and accepts its constituent beliefs, and then (c) greedily alters previous explanation preferences to reduce global cost and thereby revise beliefs. Consistency is a soft constraint in Timber; it is biased to select explanations that share consistent beliefs, assumptions, and causal structure with its other, preferred explanations. In this paper, we use Timber to simulate the belief changes of students during clinical interviews about how the seasons change. We show that Timber produces and revises a sequence of explanations similar to those of the students, which supports the psychological plausibility of AC theory.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12574DOI Listing
May 2018
1 Read

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

commonsense science
12
revise beliefs
8
conceptual change
8
competing explanations
8
science knowledge
8
computational models
8
mental models
8
explanations
7
timber
6
beliefs
6
explanations phenomena
4
algorithm construct
4
construct competing
4
abductive model
4
model fragments
4
fragments abductive
4
model formulation
4
formulation algorithm
4
explanations respect
4
cost function
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Differences between belief and knowledge systems
Abelson et al.
Cognitive Science 1979

Carey et al.
1985

Carey et al.
2009
Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding
Chi et al.
Cognitive Science 1994

Chi et al.
2000

Chi et al.
2008
An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science
Chinn et al.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1998

Similar Publications