Renal allograft rejection, lymphocyte infiltration, and de novo donor-specific antibodies in a novel model of non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy.

BMC Immunol 2017 Dec 19;18(1):52. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß Allee 11, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.

Background: Non-adherence has been associated with reduced graft survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunological mechanisms underlying chronic renal allograft rejection using a model of non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. We used a MHC (major histocompatibility complex) -mismatched rat model of renal transplantation (Brown Norway to Lewis), in which rats received daily oral cyclosporine A. In analogy to non-adherence to therapy, one group received cyclosporine A on alternating days only. Rejection was histologically graded according to the Banff classification. We quantified fibrosis by trichrome staining and intra-graft infiltration of T cells, B cells, and monocytes/macrophages by immunohistochemistry. The distribution of B lymphocytes was assessed using immunofluorescence microscopy. Intra-graft chemokine, chemokine receptor, BAFF (B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family), and immunoglobulin G transcription levels were analysed by RT-PCR. Finally, we evaluated donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity using flow cytometry.

Results: After 28 days, cellular rejection occurred during non-adherence in 5/6 animals, mixed with humoral rejection in 3/6 animals. After non-adherence, the number of T lymphocytes were elevated compared to daily immunosuppression. Monocyte numbers declined over time. Accordingly, lymphocyte chemokine transcription was significantly increased in the graft, as was the transcription of BAFF, BAFF receptor, and Immunoglobulin G. Donor specific antibodies were elevated in non-adherence, but did not induce complement-dependent cytotoxicity.

Conclusion: Cellular and humoral rejection, lymphocyte infiltration, and de novo DSA are induced in this model of non-adherence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12865-017-0236-6DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735914PMC
December 2017
60 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

model non-adherence
12
donor-specific antibodies
8
infiltration novo
8
non-adherence
8
lymphocyte infiltration
8
non-adherence immunosuppressive
8
immunosuppressive therapy
8
humoral rejection
8
rejection lymphocyte
8
renal allograft
8
allograft rejection
8
rejection
6
transcription levels
4
levels analysed
4
immunoglobulin transcription
4
tnf family
4
activating factor
4
cell activating
4
factor belonging
4
belonging tnf
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

A Gondos et al.
Transplantation 2013

MD Stegall et al.
J Am Soc Nephrol 2015

C Wiebe et al.
Am J Transplant 2012

WD Park et al.
J Am Soc Nephrol 2010

S Shishido et al.
J Am Soc Nephrol 2003

RB Mannon et al.
Am J Transplant 2010

J Sellares et al.
Am J Transplant 2012

LG Hidalgo et al.
Am J Transplant 2009

JM DeVos et al.
Clin Transpl. 2011

JA Butler et al.
Transplantation 2004

KL Brown et al.
Clin Transpl 2009

Similar Publications