Comprehensive target geometric errors and margin assessment in stereotactic partial breast irradiation.

Radiat Oncol 2017 Sep 11;12(1):151. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.

Background: Recently developed stereotactic partial breast irradiation (S-PBI) allows delivery of a high biologically potent dose to the target while sparing adjacent critical organs and normal tissue. With S-PBI tumoricidal doses, accurate and precise dose delivery is critical to achieve high treatment quality. This study is to investigate both rigid and non-rigid components of target geometric error and their corresponding margins in S-PBI and identify correlated clinical factors.

Methods: Forty-three early-stage breast cancer patients with implanted gold fiducial markers were enrolled in the study. Fiducial positions recorded on the orthogonal kV images on a Cyberknife system during treatment were used to estimate intra-fraction errors and composite errors (including intra-fraction errors and residual errors after patient setup). Both rigid and non-rigid components of intra-fraction and composite errors were analyzed and used to estimate rigid and non-rigid margins, respectively. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were conducted to evaluate correlations between clinical factors and errors.

Results: For the study group, the intra-fraction rigid and non-rigid errors are 2.0 ± 0.6 mm and 0.3 ± 0.2 mm, respectively. The composite rigid and non-rigid errors are 2.3 ± 0.5 mm and 1.3 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The rigid margins in the left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions are estimated as 2.1, 2.4, and 2.3 mm, respectively. The estimated non-rigid margin, assumed to be isotropic, is 1.7 mm. The outer breast quadrants are more susceptible to composite errors occurrence than the inner breast quadrants. The target to chest wall distance is the clinical factor correlated with target geometric errors.

Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive analysis of breast target geometric rigid and non-rigid errors in S-PBI. Upon the estimation, the non-rigid margin is comparable to rigid margin, and therefore should be included in planning target volume as it cannot be accounted for by the Cyberknife system. Treatment margins selection also need to consider the impact of relevant clinical factor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0889-6DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594509PMC
September 2017
34 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rigid non-rigid
24
target geometric
16
non-rigid errors
12
composite errors
12
errors
10
rigid
8
breast irradiation
8
non-rigid margin
8
non-rigid
8
clinical factor
8
non-rigid components
8
breast quadrants
8
partial breast
8
intra-fraction errors
8
cyberknife system
8
stereotactic partial
8
system treatment
8
target
6
breast
6
evaluate correlations
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

E Rault et al.
Radiat Oncol 2016

GN Marta et al.
Radiother Oncol 2015

FA Vicini et al.
J Clin Oncol 2001

M Keisch et al.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003

IA Olivotto et al.
J Clin Oncol 2013

SM Bentzen et al.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010

O Obayomi-Davies et al.
Front Oncol 2016

SS Vermeulen et al.
Transl Cancer Res 2014

A Rahimi et al.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017

NJ Yue et al.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011

CK Park et al.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012

Similar Publications