Improved Recovery of Erectile Function in Younger Men after Radical Prostatectomy: Does it Justify Immediate Surgery in Low-risk Patients?

Eur Urol 2018 01 26;73(1):33-37. Epub 2017 Aug 26.

Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urological Cancers, New York, NY, USA.

Background: Although active surveillance is increasingly used for the management of low-risk prostate cancer, many eligible patients are still nonetheless subject to curative treatment. One argument for considering surgery rather than active surveillance is that the probability of postoperative recovery of erectile function is age dependent, that is, patients who delay surgery may lose the window of opportunity to recover erectile function after surgery.

Objective: To model erectile function over a 10-yr period for immediate surgery versus active surveillance.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Data from 1103 men who underwent radical prostatectomy at a tertiary referral center were used.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: Patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) pre- and postoperatively as a routine part of clinical care. Preoperative IIEF-6 scores were plotted against age to assess the natural rate of functional decline due to aging. Reported erectile scores in the 2-yr period following surgery were used to assess post-surgical recovery.

Results And Limitations: Each year increase in patient age resulted in a 0.27 reduction in IIEF scores. In addition to IIEF reducing with increased age, the amount of erectile function that is recovered from presurgery to 12-mo postsurgery also decreases (-0.16 IIF points/yr, 95% confidence interval -0.27, -0.05, p=0.006). However, delayed radical prostatectomy increased the mean IIEF-6 score over a 10-yr period compared with immediate surgery (p=0.001), even under the assumption that all men placed on active surveillance are treated within 5 yr.

Conclusions: Small differences in erectile function recovery in younger men are offset by a longer period of time living with decreased postoperative function. Better erectile recovery in younger men should not be a factor used to recommend immediate surgery in patients suitable for active surveillance, even if crossover to surgery is predicted within a short period of time.

Patient Summary: Younger men have better recovery of erectile function after surgery for prostate cancer. This has led to the suggestion that delaying surgery for low-risk disease may lead patients to miss a window of opportunity to recover erectile function postoperatively. We conducted a modeling study and found that predicted erectile recovery was far superior on delayed treatment because slightly better recovery in younger men is offset by a longer period of time living with poorer postoperative function in those choosing immediate surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.007DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732855PMC
January 2018
37 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

erectile function
36
younger men
20
active surveillance
16
radical prostatectomy
12
recovery younger
12
erectile
12
recovery erectile
12
function
11
surgery
11
window opportunity
8
surgery low-risk
8
offset longer
8
period time
8
men offset
8
opportunity recover
8
erectile recovery
8
time living
8
better recovery
8
prostate cancer
8
10-yr period
8

Similar Publications