Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Differential Phase Arrangement of Cellular Clocks along the Tonotopic Axis of the Mouse Cochlea Ex Vivo.

    Curr Biol 2017 Sep 17;27(17):2623-2629.e2. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address:
    Topological distributions of individual cellular clocks have not been demonstrated in peripheral organs. The cochlea displays circadian patterns of core clock gene expression [1, 2]. PER2 protein is expressed in the hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons of the cochlea in the spiral ganglion neurons [1]. To investigate the topological organization of cellular oscillators in the cochlea, we recorded circadian rhythms from mouse cochlear explants using highly sensitive real-time tracking of PER2::LUC bioluminescence. Here, we show cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillations originating from hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons. Multi-phased cellular clocks were arranged along the length of the cochlea with oscillations initiating at the apex (low-frequency region) and traveling toward the base (high-frequency region). Phase differences of 3 hr were found between cellular oscillators in the apical and middle regions and from isolated individual cochlear regions, indicating that cellular networks organize the rhythms along the tonotopic axis. This is the first demonstration of a spatiotemporal arrangement of circadian clocks at the cellular level in a peripheral organ. Cochlear rhythms were disrupted in the presence of either voltage-gated potassium channel blocker (TEA) or extracellular calcium chelator (BAPTA), demonstrating that multiple types of ion channels contribute to the maintenance of coherent rhythms. In contrast, preventing action potentials with tetrodotoxin (TTX) or interfering with cell-to-cell communication the broad-spectrum gap junction blocker (CBX [carbenoxolone]) had no influence on cochlear rhythms. These findings highlight a dynamic regulation and longitudinal distribution of cellular clocks in the cochlea.
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with PubFacts.com)
    Source Status
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.019DOI ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    A riot of rhythms: neuronal and glial circadian oscillators in the mediobasal hypothalamus.
    Mol Brain 2009 Aug 27;2:28. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
    Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
    Background: In mammals, the synchronized activity of cell autonomous clocks in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) enables this structure to function as the master circadian clock, coordinating daily rhythms in physiology and behavior. However, the dominance of this clock has been challenged by the observations that metabolic duress can over-ride SCN controlled rhythms, and that clock genes are expressed in many brain areas, including those implicated in the regulation of appetite and feeding. The recent development of mice in which clock gene/protein activity is reported by bioluminescent constructs (luciferase or luc) now enables us to track molecular oscillations in numerous tissues ex vivo. Read More
    Monitoring cell-autonomous circadian clock rhythms of gene expression using luciferase bioluminescence reporters.
    J Vis Exp 2012 Sep 27(67). Epub 2012 Sep 27.
    Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Memphis, USA.
    In mammals, many aspects of behavior and physiology such as sleep-wake cycles and liver metabolism are regulated by endogenous circadian clocks (reviewed). The circadian time-keeping system is a hierarchical multi-oscillator network, with the central clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) synchronizing and coordinating extra-SCN and peripheral clocks elsewhere. Individual cells are the functional units for generation and maintenance of circadian rhythms, and these oscillators of different tissue types in the organism share a remarkably similar biochemical negative feedback mechanism. Read More
    Phase coupling of a circadian neuropeptide with rest/activity rhythms detected using a membrane-tethered spider toxin.
    PLoS Biol 2008 Nov;6(11):e273
    Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
    Drosophila clock neurons are self-sustaining cellular oscillators that rely on negative transcriptional feedback to keep circadian time. Proper regulation of organismal rhythms of physiology and behavior requires coordination of the oscillations of individual clock neurons within the circadian control network. Over the last decade, it has become clear that a key mechanism for intercellular communication in the circadian network is signaling between a subset of clock neurons that secrete the neuropeptide pigment dispersing factor (PDF) and clock neurons that possess its G protein-coupled receptor (PDFR). Read More
    Effect of Mefloquine, a Gap Junction Blocker, on Circadian Period2 Gene Oscillation in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Ex Vivo.
    Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2015 Sep 9;30(3):361-70. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
    Background: In mammals, the master circadian pacemaker is localized in an area of the ventral hypothalamus known as the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Previous studies have shown that pacemaker neurons in the SCN are highly coupled to one another, and this coupling is crucial for intrinsic self-sustainability of the SCN central clock, which is distinguished from peripheral oscillators. One plausible mechanism underlying the intercellular communication may involve direct electrical connections mediated by gap junctions. Read More