"Provoking conversations": case studies of organizations where Option Grid™ decision aids have become 'normalized'.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017 Aug 18;17(1):124. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, 1 Medical Center Drive 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.

Background: Implementing patient decision aids in clinic workflow has proven to be a challenge for healthcare organizations and physicians. Our aim was to determine the organizational strategies, motivations, and facilitating factors to the routine implementation of Option Grid™ encounter decision aids at two independent settings.

Method: Case studies conducted by semi-structured interview, using the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) as a framework for thematic analysis. Twenty three interviews with physicians, nurses, hospital staff and stakeholders were conducted at: 1) CapitalCare Medical Group in Albany, New York; 2) HealthPartners Clinics in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Results: 'Coherent' motivations were guided by financial incentives at CapitalCare, and by a 'champion' physician at HealthPartners. Nurses worked 'collectively' at both settings and played an important role at sites where successful implementation occurred. Some physicians did not understand the perceived utility of Option Grid™, which led to varying degrees of implementation success across sites. The appraisal work (reflexive monitoring) identified benefits, particularly in terms of information provision. Physicians at both settings, however, were concerned with time pressures and the suitability of the tool for patients with low levels of health literacy.

Conclusion: Although both practice settings illustrated the mechanisms of normalization postulated by the theory, the extent to which Option Grid™ was routinely embedded in clinic workflow varied between sites, and between clinicians. Implementation of new interventions will require attention to an identified rationale (coherence), and to the collective action, cognitive participation, and assessment of value by organizational members of the organization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0517-2DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562992PMC
August 2017
11 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

option grid™
16
decision aids
12
case studies
8
clinic workflow
8
physicians understand
4
understand perceived
4
perceived utility
4
occurred physicians
4
successful implementation
4
played role
4
role sites
4
sites successful
4
utility option
4
implementation occurred
4
led varying
4
appraisal work
4
work reflexive
4
reflexive monitoring
4
monitoring identified
4
sites appraisal
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

G Elwyn et al.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013

M Tsulukidze et al.
Patient Educ Couns 2015

A Edwards et al.
Health Expect 2006

G Elwyn et al.
Implement Sci 2008

G Elwyn et al.
Patient Educ Couns 2013

M Holmes-Rovner et al.
Health Expect 2000

RJ Volk et al.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013

KJ McCaffery et al.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013

DL Frosch et al.
Patient Educ Couns 2008

Similar Publications